C.F.R. » Title 20 » CHAPTER V—EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › PART 655—TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN WORKERS IN THE UNITED STATES › Subpart B—Labor Certification Process for Temporary Agricultural Employment in the United States (H-2A Workers)

20 C.F.R. § 655.102

Transition procedures

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The National Processing Center (NPC) shall continue to process an Application for Temporary Employment Certification submitted prior to November 14, 2022, in accordance with 20 CFR part 655, subpart B, in effect as of November 13, 2022.

(b) The NPC shall process an Application for Temporary Employment Certification submitted on or after November 14, 2022, and that has a first date of need no later than February 12, 2023, in accordance with 20 CFR part 655, subpart B, in effect as of November 13, 2022.

(c) The NPC shall process an Application for Temporary Employment Certification submitted on or after November 14, 2022, and that has a first date of need later than February 12, 2023, in accordance with all job order and application filing requirements under this subpart.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42 cases, 1987–2019 · leading case: Jorge E. Arriaga v. Florida Pac. Farms, L.L.C., 305 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jorge E. Arriaga v. Florida Pac. Farms, L.L.C., 305 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2002). · cites it 6× “See 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(9). The “adverse effect wage rate” is the minimum wage rate that DOL determines is necessary to ensure that wages of similarly situated domestic workers will not be adversely affected by the employment of H-2A workers.”
Gaudencio Garcia-Celestino v. Consol. Citrus Ltd. P'ship, 843 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2016). · cites it 6× “101 (b)(1) (2006); 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (2006); 20 C.F.R. § 653.”
De Luna-Guerrero v. North Carolina Grower's Ass'n, Inc., 338 F. Supp. 2d 649 (E.D.N.C. 2004). · cites it 5× “20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(14). The terms of H2A visas are controlled by statute, 8 U.”
Reymundo Mendoza v. Thomas Perez, 754 F.3d 1002 (D.C. Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “20 C.F.R. §§ 655.102 , 655.120(a). This “special procedures” exception predated, and was continued in, the 2010 version of the H-2A regulations.”
Jimenez v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., 742 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (D. Ariz. 2010). · cites it 6× “Instead, Plaintiffs argue that their “working arrangement” with Defendants necessarily incorporated applicable federal labor law, including 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (a)(2010). 6 At the time the Motion was filed, Section 655.”
Castellanos-Contreras v. Decatur Hotels, LLC, 622 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “§ 1184 (c)(5)(A) (requiring payment of outbound transportation costs in certain circumstances for H-2B workers); 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(5)(I) (2009) (requiring payment of inbound transportation costs in certain circumstances for H-2A workers).”
Villalobos v. North Carolina Growers Ass'n Inc., 252 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.P.R. 2002). · cites it 10× “§ 1188 (c) (2) (B) (6); 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(6)(iv) and § 655.”
Eeoc v. Global Horizons, Inc, 915 F.3d 631 (9th Cir. 2019). “20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(1), (4), (5)(iii).”
Llacua v. W. Range Ass'n, 930 F.3d 1161 (10th Cir. 2019). “See 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 . The DOL has implemented special procedures governing the minimum wage for H-2A shepherds.”
Rowe v. Grapevine Corp., 527 S.E.2d 814 (W. Va. 1999). · cites it 3× “See 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(6). Just as the WARN payments were determined not to be “compensation for labor or services rendered” or “then accrued fringe benefits,” the three-fourths guarantee payments are not “wages” under the Act’s definitions.”
Centeno-Bernuy v. Becker Farms, 564 F. Supp. 2d 166 (W.D.N.Y. 2008). · cites it 3× “1 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(9). Numerous other regula *171 tions address, inter alia, payment of transportation and subsistence costs, housing, and record keeping.”
Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc., 644 F. Supp. 2d 696 (E.D.N.C. 2009). “shall be the work contract,” 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(14); see 29 C.F.R.”
Show all 42 citing cases →
— 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(a) — 1 case
Pinnock v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op., 791 So. 2d 1135 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
— 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(b) — 2 cases
Centeno-Bernuy v. Becker Farms, 564 F. Supp. 2d 166 (W.D.N.Y. 2008). “1 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(9). Numerous other regula *171 tions address, inter alia, payment of transportation and subsistence costs, housing, and record keeping.”
Centeno-Bernuy v. Becker Farms, 546 F. Supp. 2d 166 (W.D.N.Y. 2008).
— 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(b)(5)(i) — 4 cases
Jorge E. Arriaga v. Florida Pac. Farms, L.L.C., 305 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2002). “See 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(9). The “adverse effect wage rate” is the minimum wage rate that DOL determines is necessary to ensure that wages of similarly situated domestic workers will not be adversely affected by the employment of H-2A workers.”
De Luna-Guerrero v. North Carolina Grower's Ass'n, Inc., 338 F. Supp. 2d 649 (E.D.N.C. 2004). “20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(14). The terms of H2A visas are controlled by statute, 8 U.”
Centeno-Bernuy v. Becker Farms, 564 F. Supp. 2d 166 (W.D.N.Y. 2008). “1 20 C.F.R. § 655.102 (b)(9). Numerous other regula *171 tions address, inter alia, payment of transportation and subsistence costs, housing, and record keeping.”
Centeno-Bernuy v. Becker Farms, 546 F. Supp. 2d 166 (W.D.N.Y. 2008).
— 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(b)(9)(B) — 1 case
AFL-CIO v. McLaughlin, 702 F. Supp. 314 (D.D.C. 1988).
— 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(b)(9)(ii)(B) — 1 case
NAACP, Jefferson Cnty. Branch v. U.S. Sec'y of Labor, 865 F. Supp. 903 (D.D.C. 1994).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.