20 C.F.R. § 702.105
Use of the title District Director in place of Deputy Commissioner
Wherever the statute refers to Deputy Commissioner, these regulations have substituted the term District Director. The substitution is purely an administrative one, and in no way effects the authority of or the powers granted and responsibilities imposed by the statute on that position.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1992–2019 · leading case: Global Linguist Solutions, LLC v. Abdulraouf Abdelmeged, 913 F.3d 921 (9th Cir. 2019).
Global Linguist Solutions, LLC v. Abdulraouf Abdelmeged, 913 F.3d 921 (9th Cir. 2019). “§ 1653 (b); 20 C.F.R. § 702.105 . The panel held that substantial evidence supported the administrative law judge’s determination that beginning in November 2009, the claimant met both the “medical” and the “economic” aspect of “disability” as defined by the statute.”
Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. James Barry & Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 41 F.3d 903 (3rd Cir. 1994). “Pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 702.105 , the term “district director" has heen substituted for the term "deputy commissioner” which is used in the statute.”
Robert Nealon v. California Stevedore & Ballast Co., & Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 996 F.2d 966 (9th Cir. 1993). “20 C.F.R. § 702.105 . To avoid confusion, we retain the old title throughout this opinion.”
Hice v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, 156 F.3d 214 (D.C. Cir. 1998). “” 20 C.F.R. § 702.105 (1998).) The Baltimore District Director assigned Hice’s case to an ALJ in Washington, D.”
Keen v. Exxon Corp., 35 F.3d 226 (5th Cir. 1994). “” See 20 C.F.R. § 702.105 . 3 . Inexplicably, the deputy director mailed the copies of the order to the wrong addresses for both Exxon and its attorney, and the record indicates that Exxon first received its copy of the ruling on February 27, 1990, eleven days after it was filed.”
Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, U.S. Dept. of, 976 F.2d 934 (5th Cir. 1992). “20 C.F.R. § 702.105 . 3 . 33 U.S.C. § 914 (b), (d), (e).”
Kreschollek v. S. Stevedoring Co., 223 F.3d 202 (3rd Cir. 2000). “20 C.F.R. § 702.105 . We use the designation "district director.”
Mikha v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Prog., 681 F. App'x 595 (9th Cir. 2017). “§ 1653 (b); 20 C.F.R. § 702.105 . We conclude that the Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction to hear Mik-ha’s petition from the BRB, and retain jurisdiction over Mikha’s petition rather than transferring the case.”
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Michael Firth Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 363 F.3d 311 (4th Cir. 2004). “…4 . The regulations substitute the term district director for that of deputy commissioner in the statute. See 20 C.F.R. § 702.105 .”
Newport News Shipbld v. DOWCP (4th Cir. 2004). “See 20 C.F.R. § 702.105 . NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING v.”
Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, U.S. Dept. of (5th Cir. 1992). “20 C.F.R. § 702.105 . Programs. Bound by our prior decision holding this letter invalid, and declining to apply the principles of equitable estoppel against the government, we reject the petition for review and affirm the assessment of penalties by the Benefits Review Board.”
Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, U.S. Dept. of (5th Cir. 1992). “20 C.F.R. § 702.105 . Programs. Bound by our prior decision holding this letter invalid, and declining to apply the principles of equitable estoppel against the government, we reject the petition for review and affirm the assessment of penalties by the Benefits Review Board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.