21 C.F.R. § 1301.21

Exemption from fees

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Administrator shall exempt from payment of an application fee for registration or reregistration:

(1) Any hospital or other institution which is operated by an agency of the United States (including the U.S. Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard), of any State, or any political subdivision or agency thereof.

(2) Any individual practitioner who is required to obtain an individual registration in order to carry out his or her duties as an official of an agency of the United States (including the U.S. Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Space Force, and Coast Guard), of any State, or any political subdivision or agency thereof.

(b) In order to claim exemption from payment of a registration or reregistration application fee, the registrant shall have completed the certification on the appropriate application form, wherein the registrant's superior (if the registrant is an individual) or officer (if the registrant is an agency) certifies to the status and address of the registrant and to the authority of the registrant to acquire, possess, or handle controlled substances.

(c) Exemption from payment of a registration or reregistration application fee does not relieve the registrant of any other requirements or duties prescribed by law.

[62 FR 13950, Mar. 24, 1997, as amended at 86 FR 51822, Sept. 17, 2021]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1975–1996 · leading case: United States v. David S. King, United States of Am. v. Stanley E. Deal, M. D., 587 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. David S. King, United States of Am. v. Stanley E. Deal, M. D., 587 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1978). “See 21 C.F.R. § 1301.21 (1977) (annual registration).”

United States v. Darrell Daniel Goldfine, United States of Am. v. Solomon Walter Goldfine, 538 F.2d 815 (9th Cir. 1976). “§ 822 (a); 21 C.F.R. § 1301.21 (1974)]. To determine the propriety of reregistration, the Attorney General must consider among others these factors: the degree to which the registrant has avoided improper diversion of controlled substances; his past distribution experience…”

United States v. Stidham, 938 F. Supp. 808 (S.D. Ala. 1996). · cites it 3× “” 21 C.F.R. §§ 1301.21 & 1301.22. In this case, the government considers the registrant to be Gulf Coast Drug Control Center, which Stidham owned either solely or in partnership with Dr.”

United States v. Pollock, 402 F. Supp. 1310 (D. Mass. 1975). · cites it 2× “21 C.F.R. § 1301.21 . The Government’s position is that unregistered chemists are absolutely prohibited by federal regulation from conducting tests using controlled substances.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.