23 C.F.R. § 771.121

Findings of no significant impact

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Administration will review the EA, comments submitted on the EA (in writing or at a public hearing or meeting), and other supporting documentation, as appropriate. If the Administration agrees with the applicant's recommendations pursuant to § 771.119(g), the Administration will issue a written FONSI incorporating by reference the EA and any other appropriate supporting documentation.

(b) After the Administration issues a FONSI, a notice of availability of the FONSI must be sent by the applicant to the affected units of Federal, State, and local government, and the document must be available from the applicant and the Administration upon request by the public. Notice must also be sent to the State intergovernmental review contacts established under Executive Order 12372. To minimize hardcopy requests and printing costs, the Administration encourages the use of project websites or other publicly accessible electronic means to make the FONSI available.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1985–2002 · leading case: Davis v. Mineta, 302 F.3d 1104 (10th Cir. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Davis v. Mineta, 302 F.3d 1104 (10th Cir. 2002). “23 C.F.R. § 771.121 (a). Second, the record establishes that the FHWA failed to conduct a sufficient independent review of Horrocks’ work to insulate itself from the biases toward a FONSI reflected in Horrocks’ draft EA.”

Twp. of Belleville v. Fed. Transit Admin., 30 F. Supp. 2d 782 (D.N.J. 1998). “23 C.F.R. § 771.121 (a). If the administration determines at any time in the EA process that the action is likely to have a significant impact on the environment, the regulations direct that an EIS will be required.”

Riverdale Env't Action Comm. Along Hudson—R.E.A.C.H. v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 638 F. Supp. 99 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). · cites it 2× “Consistent with 23 C.F.R. § 771.121 , UMTA then performed an independent assessment of the EA and the available information.”

Citizen Advocates for ResponSible Expansion, Inc. v. Dole, 770 F.2d 423 (5th Cir. 1985). “23 C.F.R. § 771.121 (1985). . 23 C.F.R. § 771.”

Riverdale Environ. Action Comm. v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 638 F. Supp. 99 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). · cites it 2× “Consistent with 23 C.F.R. § 771.121 , UMTA then performed an independent assessment of the EA and the available information.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.