C.F.R. » Title 24 » CHAPTER IX—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR PUBLIC AND INDIAN HOUSING, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT › PART 1000—NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING ACTIVITIES › Subpart D—Allocation Formula

24 C.F.R. § 1000.312

What is current assisted stock?

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Current assisted stock consists of housing units owned or operated pursuant to an ACC. This includes all low rent, Mutual Help, and Turnkey III housing units under management as of September 30, 1997, as indicated in the Formula Response Form.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 2010–2019 · leading case: Lummi Tribe of Lummi Reservation, Washington v. United States, 870 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lummi Tribe of Lummi Reservation, Washington v. United States, 870 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2017). “24 C.F.R. §§ 1000.312 , 1000.314, 1000.318.”
Fort Peck Hous. Auth. v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 367 F. App'x 884 (10th Cir. 2010). · cites it 3× “” 24 C.F.R. § 1000.312 . B. Relevant Factual History HUD’s Inspector General conducted a nation-wide audit in 2002.”
Crow Tribal Hous. Auth. v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 924 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (D. Mont. 2013). · cites it 3× “24 C.F.R. § 1000.312 . This adjustment would be equal to the number of dwelling units a tribe “no longer has the legal right to own, operate, or maintain .”
Fort Belknap Hous. Dep't v. Off. of Pub. & Indian Hous., 726 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2013). “See 24 C.F.R. §§ 1000.312 , 1000.314. B. The 2001 Letter On August 1, 2001, HUD sent Fort Belknap a letter (“the 2001 letter”) and stated that Fort Belknap “may have incorrectly received credit in .”
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 353 (Fed. Cl. 2013). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 1000.312 . The regulations additionally provided, however, that number would be adjusted downward to account for housing units that had reached the end of their rent-to-own terms and had been conveyed to the homeowner.”
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, Lummi Nation Hous. Auth., Fort Berthold Hous. Auth., & Hopi Tribal Hous. Auth. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2013). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 1000.312 . The regulations additionally provided, however, that that number would be adjusted downward to account for housing units that had reached the end of their rent-to-own terms and had been conveyed to the homeowner.”
Walker River Paiute Tribe v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 68 F. Supp. 3d 1202 (D. Nev. 2014). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 1000.312 . The dwelling units considered by HUD include all Section 8 units, low-rent units, and Mutual Help Program and Turnkey III units constructed under the 1937 Housing Act.”
Hous. Auth. of the Te-Moak Tribe of W. Shoshone Indians v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 85 F. Supp. 3d 1213 (D. Nev. 2015). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 1000.312 . The dwelling units considered by HUD include all Section 8 units, low-rent units, and Mutual Help Program and Turnkey III units constructed under the 1937 Housing Act.”
San Antonio Hous. Auth. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2019). “24 C.F.R. §§ 1000.312 , 1000.314, 1000.318.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.