24 C.F.R. § 51.202

Approval of HUD-assisted projects

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Department will not approve an application for assistance for a proposed project located at less than the acceptable separation distance from a hazard, as defined in § 51.201, unless appropriate mitigating measures, as defined in § 51.205, are implemented, or unless mitigating measures are already in place.

(b) In the case of all applications for proposed HUD-assisted projects, the Department shall evaluate projected development plans in the vicinity of these projects to determine whether there are plans to install a hazardous operation in close proximity to the proposed project. If the evaluation shows that such a plan exists, the Department shall not approve assistance for the project unless the Department obtains satisfactory assurances that adequate mitigating measures will be taken when the hazardous operation is installed.

[49 FR 5103, Feb. 10, 1984, as amended at 61 FR 13334, Mar. 26, 1996]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2020 · leading case: Coliseum Square Ass'n v. Jackson, 465 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2006).
Coliseum Square Ass'n v. Jackson, 465 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2006). “24 C.F.R § 51.202(a). “Hazards” are defined to include any “any stationary container which stores, handles or processes hazardous substances of an explosive or fire prone nature.”
Enter. Crude GP LLC & Enter. Crude Pipeline, LLC v. Sealy Partners, LLC & Sealy Partners No. 3, LP (Tex. App. 2020). “” 24 C.F.R. § 51.202 (a). “Acceptable separation distance” means the distance beyond which the explosion or combustion of a hazard is not likely to cause structures or individuals to be subjected to blast overpressure or thermal radiation flux levels in excess of promulgated…”
— 24 C.F.R. § 51.202(a) — 1 case
Coliseum Square Ass'n v. Jackson, 465 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2006). “24 C.F.R § 51.202(a). “Hazards” are defined to include any “any stationary container which stores, handles or processes hazardous substances of an explosive or fire prone nature.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.