C.F.R. » Title 24 » CHAPTER V—OFFICE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT › SUBCHAPTER C—COMMUNITY FACILITIES › PART 570—COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS › Subpart D—Entitlement Grants

24 C.F.R. § 570.302

Submission requirements

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In order to receive its annual CDBG entitlement grant, a grantee must submit a consolidated plan in accordance with 24 CFR part 91. That part includes requirements for the content of the consolidated plan, for the process of developing the consolidated plan, including citizen participation provisions, for the submission date, for HUD approval, and for the amendment process.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2506-0117) [60 FR 1915, Jan. 5, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1983–2019 · leading case: Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. John O. Marsh, Sec'y of the Army, 747 F.2d 616 (11th Cir. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. John O. Marsh, Sec'y of the Army, 747 F.2d 616 (11th Cir. 1984). · cites it 11× “Finally, in 1982 the Department of Housing and Urban Development informed Alma it would release the funds if certain requirements were satisfied, including compliance with two 1978 HUD regulations, 24 C.F.R. § 570.302 (b)(1) and (d), 1 requiring that the project “principally”…”
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. John O. Marsh, Sec'y of the Army, 721 F.2d 767 (11th Cir. 1983). · cites it 5× “Appellees argue and the district court held that the statute does not impose a requirement of fifty percent benefit to low and *770 moderate income persons; that the fifty percent directive is regulatory only, see 24 C.F.R. § 570.302 (b)(1), (d)(2) (1983); and that, therefore,…”
Rev. Roy Jones v. The City of Lubbock, 727 F.2d 364 (5th Cir. 1984). “24 C.F.R. § 570.302 (1983). The City must certify that: its community development program has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities that will benefit low- and moderate-income families.”
United States v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ., 635 F. Supp. 1577 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). · cites it 2× “HUD shall obligate the funds prior to the expiration of the funding authority in September if either (a) the City submits an acceptable Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) and other documentation as required by 24 C.F.R. § 570.302 prior to that expiration, or (b) such HAP and…”
Nat'l Fair Hous. All. v. Carson, 330 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “24 C.F.R. § 570.302 ; see also id. pt. 91.”
Martin v. Reed, 480 So. 2d 1180 (Ala. 1985). “" 24 C.F.R. 570.302 (b) (1983). The opinion of the federal court dealt exclusively with whether the use of the funds would meet the requirements set forth in the regulations.”
Nat'l Fair Hous. All. v. Carson (D.D.C. 2018). “24 C.F.R. § 570.302 ; see also id. pt. 91.”
Nat'l Fair Hous. All. v. Carson (D.D.C. 2019). “” 24 C.F.R. § 570.302 . A Consolidated Plan operates as (1) “[a] planning document for the jurisdiction, which builds on a participatory process among citizens, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders”; (2) “[a] submission for federal funds under HUD’s formula grant…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.