24 C.F.R. § 886.122
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1981–1983 · leading case: BSR Hous. Dev. Fund v. Ford, 109 Misc. 2d 445 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1981).
BSR Hous. Dev. Fund v. Ford, 109 Misc. 2d 445 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1981). “Nor are the respondents aided by 24 CFR 886.122 (b), (e) which is embodied verbatim in the lease and which reads as follows: “The Lessor shall not evict the Lessee unless the Lessor complies with the requirements of local law, if any, and of this provision.”
Love v. United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 704 F.2d 100 (3rd Cir. 1983). “See 24 C.F.R. §§ 886.122 , 450.-1-.7 (1982). Second, they alleged that the eviction procedures, as well as other terms, specified in their lease agreements were unreasonable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.