24 C.F.R. § 983.257

Owner termination of tenancy and eviction

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

24 CFR 982.310 of this title applies with the exception that 24 CFR 982.310(d)(1)(iii) and (iv) does not apply to the PBV program. (In the PBV program, “good cause” does not include a business or economic reason or desire to use the unit for an individual, family, or non-residential rental purpose.) In addition, the owner may terminate the tenancy in accordance with the requirements related to lease terminations for development activity on units under a HAP contract as provided in § 983.157(g)(6)(iii) and for substantial improvement to units under a HAP contract as provided in § 983.212(a)(3)(iii). 24 CFR 5.858 through 5.861 on eviction for drug and alcohol abuse and 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking) apply to the PBV program.

[89 FR 38334, May 7, 2024]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2012–2017 · leading case: Indigo Real Est. Servs., Inc. v. Wadsworth, 280 P.3d 506 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Indigo Real Est. Servs., Inc. v. Wadsworth, 280 P.3d 506 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “24 C.F.R. § 983.257 (a). The addendum also specifies that a lease may be terminated for a “[mjaterial failure to carry out obligations under any State landlord and tenant act,” or for “[o]ther good cause.”

Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey, 874 F.3d 98 (3rd Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “36,146, 36,148 (June 25, 2014) (final rule); see also 24 C.F.R. § 983.257 (2017) (reflecting codification).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.