25 C.F.R. § 141.11

Tribal fees, taxes, and enforcement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The regulations in this part do not preclude the Hopi, Navajo, or Zuni tribal councils from assessing and collecting such fees or taxes as they may deem appropriate from reservation businesses.

(b) Nothing in the regulations of this part may be construed to preclude tribal enforcement of these regulations or consistent tribal ordinances.

[40 FR 39837, Aug. 29, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 3288, Jan. 22, 1976. Redesignated at 47 FR 13327, Mar. 30, 1982]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1977–2001 · leading case: Atkinson Trading Co. v. Shirley, 532 U.S. 645 (2001).
Atkinson Trading Co. v. Shirley, 532 U.S. 645 (2001). “25 CFR § 141.11 (2000). [11] The record does not reflect the amount of non-Indian fee land within the Navajo Nation.”
United States v. Humboldt Fir, Inc., 426 F. Supp. 292 (N.D. Cal. 1977). “25 C.F.R. 141.11, 141.23. Humboldt chose to do nothing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.