25 C.F.R. § 573.3
Notice of violation
(a) The Chair may issue a notice of violation to any person for violations of any provision of the Act or this chapter, or of any tribal ordinance or resolution approved by the Chair under part 522 of this chapter.
(b) A notice of violation shall contain:
(1) A citation to the federal or tribal requirement that has been or is being violated;
(2) A description of the circumstances surrounding the violation, set forth in common and concise language;
(3) Measures required to correct the violation;
(4) A reasonable time for correction, if the respondent cannot take measures to correct the violation immediately; and
(5) Notice of rights of appeal.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1998–2015 · leading case: City of Duluth v. Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, 702 F.3d 1147 (8th Cir. 2013).
City of Duluth v. Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, 702 F.3d 1147 (8th Cir. 2013). “25 C.F.R. § 573.3 (a). Shortly after the parties began the arbitration, the NIGC issued a NOV on July 12, 2011.”
Fort Sill Apache Tribe v. Nat'l Indian Gaming Comm'n, 103 F. Supp. 3d 113 (D.D.C. 2015). “25 C.F.R. §§ 573.3 (a); 577.15 (2008). 2 NIGC regulations required the Commission to designate a presiding official, who, after conducting a hearing within 30 days of the notice of appeal, must make a recommended decision to the Commission after the hearing record closes.”
Cheyenne-Arapaho Gaming Comm'n v. Nat'l Indian Gaming Comm'n, 214 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (N.D. Okla. 2002). “3 (Notice of Violation) states: (a) The Chairman may issue a notice of violation to any person for violations of any provision of the Act or this chapter, or of any tribal ordinance or resolution approved by the Chairman under part 522 or 523 of this chapter, (b) A notice of…”
Sas & Fox Tribe of Mississippi in Iowa v. United States, 264 F. Supp. 2d 830 (N.D. Iowa 2003). “§ 2713 (a)(3); 25 C.F.R. § 573.3 . The most severe enforcement measure made available to the NIGC under the IGRA is an order of temporary closure of Indian gaming for substantial violations of the provisions of the IGRA, the regulations promulgated thereunder or tribal…”
City of Duluth v. Nat'l Indian Gaming Comm'n, 89 F. Supp. 3d 56 (D.D.C. 2015). “§ 2713 (a) and 25 C.F.R. § 573.3 (a)). Therefore, Plaintiffs arguments about other sections of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act are only relevant insofar as those sections would prevent the Commission from exercising its authority under section 2713.”
United States v. Santee Sioux Tribe (8th Cir. 1998). “2 On April 25, 1996, the Chairman of the NIGC entered a notice of violation, see 25 C.F.R. § 573.3 (1996), and an order of temporary closure, see 25 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.