26 C.F.R. § 1.162-12

Expenses of farmers

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Farms engaged in for profit. A farmer who operates a farm for profit is entitled to deduct from gross income as necessary expenses all amounts actually expended in the carrying on of the business of farming. The cost of ordinary tools of short life or small cost, such as hand tools, including shovels, rakes, etc., may be deducted. The purchase of feed and other costs connected with raising livestock may be treated as expense deductions insofar as such costs represent actual outlay, but not including the value of farm produce grown upon the farm or the labor of the taxpayer. For rules regarding the capitalization of expenses of producing property in the trade or business of farming, see section 263A and the regulations thereunder. For taxable years beginning after July 12, 1972, where a farmer is engaged in producing crops and the process of gathering and disposal of such crops is not completed within the taxable year in which such crops were planted, expenses deducted may, with the consent of the Commissioner (see section 446 and the regulations thereunder), be determined upon the crop method, and such deductions must be taken in the taxable year in which the gross income from the crop has been realized. For taxable years beginning on or before July 12, 1972, where a farmer is engaged in producing crops which take more than a year from the time of planting to the process of gathering and disposal, expenses deducted may, with the consent of the Commissioner (see section 446 and the regulations thereunder), be determined upon the crop method, and such deductions must be taken in the taxable year in which the gross income from the crop has been realized. If a farmer does not compute income upon the crop method, the cost of seeds and young plants which are purchased for further development and cultivation prior to sale in later years may be deducted as an expense for the year of purchase, provided the farmer follows a consistent practice of deducting such costs as an expense from year to year. The preceding sentence does not apply to the cost of seeds and young plants connected with the planting of timber (see section 611 and the regulations thereunder). For rules regarding the capitalization of expenses of producing property in the trade or business of farming, see section 263A of the Internal Revenue Code and § 1.263A-4. The cost of farm machinery, equipment, and farm buildings represents a capital investment and is not an allowable deduction as an item of expense. Amounts expended in the development of farms, orchards, and ranches prior to the time when the productive state is reached may, at the election of the taxpayer, be regarded as investments of capital. For the treatment of soil and water conservation expenditures as expenses which are not chargeable to capital account, see section 175 and the regulations thereunder. For taxable years beginning after December 31, 1959, in the case of expenditures paid or incurred by farmers for fertilizer, lime, etc., see section 180 and the regulations thereunder. Amounts expended in purchasing work, breeding, dairy, or sporting animals are regarded as investments of capital, and shall be depreciated unless such animals are included in an inventory in accordance with § 1.61-4. The purchase price of an automobile, even when wholly used in carrying on farming operations, is not deductible, but is regarded as an investment of capital. The cost of gasoline, repairs, and upkeep of an automobile if used wholly in the business of farming is deductible as an expense; if used partly for business purposes and partly for the pleasure or convenience of the taxpayer or his family, such cost may be apportioned according to the extent of the use for purposes of business and pleasure or convenience, and only the proportion of such cost justly attributable to business purposes is deductible as a necessary expense.

(b) Farms not engaged in for profit; taxable years beginning before January 1, 1970—(1) In general. If a farm is operated for recreation or pleasure and not on a commercial basis, and if the expenses incurred in connection with the farm are in excess of the receipts therefrom, the entire receipts from the sale of farm products may be ignored in rendering a return of income, and the expenses incurred, being regarded as personal expenses, will not constitute allowable deductions.

(2) Effective date. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply with respect to taxable years beginning before January 1, 1970.

(3) Cross reference. For provisions relating to activities not engaged in for profit, applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1969, see section 183 and the regulations thereunder.

[T.D. 7198, 37 FR 13679, July 13, 1972, as amended by T.D. 8729, 62 FR 44546, Aug. 22, 1997; T.D. 8897, 65 FR 50643, Aug. 21, 2000]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64 cases, 1963–2016 · leading case: Van Raden v. Comm'r, 71 T.C. 1083 (Tax Ct. 1979).
Van Raden v. Comm'r, 71 T.C. 1083 (Tax Ct. 1979). · cites it 8× “It is optional with the taxpayer *179 which of these methods of accounting is used but, having elected one method, the option so exercised will be binding upon the taxpayer for the year for which the option is exercised and for subsequent years unless another method is…”
Sharon v. Comm'r, 66 T.C. 515 (Tax Ct. 1976). · cites it 2× “However, since the fee was paid prior to the years in issue, we cannot allow a current deduction in this case. Therefore, in view of the Commissioner's concession and our conclusion with respect to the third and fourth issues, a proportionate part of such fee may be added to the…”
Hillsboro Nat'l Bank v. Comm'r, 460 U.S. 370 (1983). · cites it 2× “It bears mention that the Commissioner presently takes the position that an expenditure for feed that will be consumed in a subsequent year will not be allowed unless three tests are satisfied: it must be a payment (not a refundable deposit), it must be made for a business…”
Zirker v. Comm'r, 87 T.C. 970 (Tax Ct. 1986). · cites it 2× “The interest deduction claimed under section 163 likewise is not directly affected by a finding of a zero adjusted basis.”
Wiener v. Comm'r, 58 T.C. 81 (Tax Ct. 1972). · cites it 10× “, for the amounts alleged to constitute raising costs and under sec. 167(a), I.R.C. 1954 , for depreciation of the costs of the animals.”
Rojas v. Comm'r, 90 T.C. 1090 (Tax Ct. 1988). · cites it 4× “" Even in the case of a farming syndicate, therefore, Congress stated its intention to allow farm supplies to be deducted when they are no longer "on hand" and, in allowing such deductions, Congress made no reference to the sale of the crops produced.”
Hi-Plains Enter., Inc. v. Comm'r, 60 T.C. 158 (Tax Ct. 1973). · cites it 6× “Second, the purchase of feed and other costs connected with raising livestock may be treated as expense deductions insofar as such costs represent actual outlay.”
Packard v. Comm'r, 85 T.C. 397 (Tax Ct. 1985). · cites it 8× “5 In conjunction with section 162 , which allows a deduction for all ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business, farmers are permitted to deduct as necessary expenses all amounts actually *416 expended in…”
Auburn Packing Co. v. Comm'r, 60 T.C. 794 (Tax Ct. 1973). · cites it 4× “The regulation makes no distinction between cash and accrual method taxpayers, thus allowing accrual method taxpayers a current deduction for expenses that would normally be properly chargeable to inventory.”
Wilbur v. Comm'r, 43 T.C. 322 (Tax Ct. 1964). · cites it 4× “Held , that taxpayer-farmer who in fact deducted certain cultural practices expenditures on his 1958-60 returns may not be required to capitalize them merely because in electing to capitalize other such expenditures in those years he erroneously thought he was capitalizing all…”
Duggar v. Comm'r, 71 T.C. 147 (Tax Ct. 1978). · cites it 4× “He further argues that once he elected to proceed under Management Agreement Two, the cost of maintaining and caring for *48 those female calves is currently deductible.”
Grynberg v. Comm'r, 83 T.C. 255 (Tax Ct. 1984). · cites it 2× “9 With respect to these latter expenditures, the special tax treatment given to them appears to be directed primarily at providing ordinary expense treatment where capitalization would otherwise be required.”
— 26 C.F.R. § 1.162-12(a) — 1 case
Bonard G. Stice & Gladys Stice v. United States, 540 F.2d 1077 (5th Cir. 1976).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.