C.F.R. » Title 27 » CHAPTER I—ALCOHOL AND TOBACCO TAX AND TRADE BUREAU, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY › SUBCHAPTER A—ALCOHOL › PART 1—BASIC PERMIT REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE FEDERAL ALCOHOL ADMINISTRATION ACT, NONINDUSTRIAL USE OF DISTILLED SPIRITS AND WINE, BULK SALES AND BOTTLING OF DISTILLED SPIRITS › Subpart C—Basic Permits

27 C.F.R. § 1.56

Oaths and affirmations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A document must be verified by an oath or affirmation taken before a person authorized by the laws of the United States or by State or local law to administer oaths or affirmations in the jurisdiction where the document is executed when required by:

(a) Regulation; or

(b) An appropriate TTB officer.

[T.D. ATF-416, 64 FR 49985, Sept. 15, 1999]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S v. Gen. Elec. Co. (D. Mass. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S v. Gen. Elec. Co. (D. Mass. 2022). “Specifically, counts V and VI of GE’s counterclaims allege that the ‘776 and ‘413 Patents are unenforceable on the basis of inequitable conduct by SGRE with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) under 27 C.F.R. § 1.56 . See id. 24-31 . As to the ‘776 Patent,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.