27 C.F.R. § 478.26
Curio and relic determination
Any person who desires to obtain a determination whether a particular firearm is a curio or relic shall submit a written request, in duplicate, for a ruling thereon to the Director. Each such request shall be executed under the penalties of perjury and shall contain a complete and accurate description of the firearm, and such photographs, diagrams, or drawings as may be necessary to enable the Director to make a determination. The Director may require the submission of the firearm for examination and evaluation. If the submission of the firearm is impractical, the person requesting the determination shall so advise the Director and designate the place where the firearm will be available for examination and evaluation.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle (Minn. 2025).
State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle (Minn. 2025). “11 (defining “[a]ntique firearm”), and guns that qualify as collectors’ curios or relics, 27 C.F.R. § 478.26 . See U.S. Dep’t of Just.”
State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle (Minn. 2025). “11 (defining “[a]ntique firearm”), and guns that qualify as collectors’ curios or relics, 27 C.F.R. § 478.26 . See U.S. Dep’t of Just.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Logan Hunter Vagle, Appellant (Minn. 2025). “11 (defining “[a]ntique firearm”), and guns that qualify as collectors’ curios or relics, 27 C.F.R. § 478.26 . See U.S. Dep’t of Just.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.