27 C.F.R. § 478.58
State or other law
A license issued under this part confers no right or privilege to conduct business or activity contrary to State or other law. The holder of such a license is not by reason of the rights and privileges granted by that license immune from punishment for operating a firearm or ammunition business or activity in violation of the provisions of any State or other law. Similarly, compliance with the provisions of any State or other law affords no immunity under Federal law or regulations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2007–2015 · leading case: Kole v. Vill. of Norridge, 941 F. Supp. 2d 933 (N.D. Ill. 2013).
Kole v. Vill. of Norridge, 941 F. Supp. 2d 933 (N.D. Ill. 2013). “27 C.F.R. § 478.58 . Moreover, the Supreme Court has itself recognized that state and local governments have ample room to enact firearm regulations.”
People v. Wilmshurst., 146 Cal. App. 4th 621 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007). “7 ( 27 C.F.R. § 478.58 (2006).) Defendant consequently reaches for a more attenuated basis for his preemption claim.”
Knight v. Bratton, 48 Misc. 3d 536 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2015). “” (27 CFR 478.58.) Conclusion It is hereby adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.