C.F.R. » Title 27 » CHAPTER II—BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › SUBCHAPTER E—EXPLOSIVE LICENSE AND PERMIT PROCEEDINGS › PART 771—RULES OF PRACTICE IN EXPLOSIVE LICENSE AND PERMIT PROCEEDINGS › Subpart F—Hearing Procedure

27 C.F.R. § 771.80

Revocation or denial of renewal

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In hearings on the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or permit, the burden of proof is on the Government to show that the Director of Industry Operations had reason to believe that the licensee or permittee is not entitled to a permit or license, as may be the case. The Government must meet this proof by a preponderance of the evidence.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2023 · leading case: Cew Props. v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 979 F.3d 1271 (10th Cir. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cew Props. v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 979 F.3d 1271 (10th Cir. 2020). “See 27 C.F.R. § 771.80 (stating that in a hearing to revoke an explosives license, “the burden of proof is on the Government to show that [ATF] had reason to believe that the licensee .”
Firestorm Pyrotechnics v. Dettelbach, 61 F.4th 768 (10th Cir. 2023). “See 27 C.F.R. § 771.80 (2023) (“In hearings on the revocation .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.