28 C.F.R. § 20.30
Applicability
The provisions of this subpart of the regulations apply to the III System and the FIRS, and to duly authorized local, state, tribal, federal, foreign, and international criminal justice agencies to the extent that they utilize the services of the III System or the FIRS. This subpart is applicable to both manual and automated criminal history records.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case: John Doe v. William H. Webster, Dir., Fbi, 606 F.2d 1226 (D.C. Cir. 1979).
John Doe v. William H. Webster, Dir., Fbi, 606 F.2d 1226 (D.C. Cir. 1979). “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 20.30 et seq. (1978); Judicial Response, supra note 18, at 852-53, 862.”
Rogan v. City of Los Angeles, 668 F. Supp. 1384 (C.D. Cal. 1987). “system to assure that information on individuals is kept complete, accurate and current — ”) 4 ; see also: 28 C.F.R. 20.30, 20.31(a) (1986) (Section 20.”
United States v. Hall, 452 F. Supp. 1008 (S.D.N.Y. 1977). “§ 534 , the Attorney General is obligated to collect and classify criminal records and to “exchange these records with, and for the official use of, authorized officials of the Federal Government, the States, cities, and penal and other institutions.”
Chalhoub v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (M.D. Penn. 2024). “§ 534 (f); 28 C.F.R. §20.30 , et. seq; see also PA. R.”
Access to Crim. History Records by Non-Governmental Entities Performing Authorized Crim. Just. Functions (OLC 1998). “See 28 C.F.R. §20.30 . The regulations provide that CHRI contained in systems main tained by the Department of Justice “ will be made available” : (1) To criminal justice agencies for criminal justice purposes; and (2) To Federal agencies authorized to receive it pursuant to…”
United States Participation in Interpol Computerized Search File Proj. (OLC 1981). “” 28 C.F.R. § 20.30 . “D epartm ent o f Justice criminal history record information system*1 is defined to include only the Identification Division and Com puterized Criminal History File Systems operated by the FBI.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.