C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 20—CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION SYSTEMS › Subpart C—Federal Systems and Exchange of Criminal History Record Information

28 C.F.R. § 20.35

Criminal Justice Information Services Advisory Policy Board

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) There is established a CJIS Advisory Policy Board, the purpose of which is to recommend to the FBI Director general policy with respect to the philosophy, concept, and operational principles of various criminal justice information systems managed by the FBI's CJIS Division.

(b) The Board includes representatives from state and local criminal justice agencies; members of the judicial, prosecutorial, and correctional segments of the criminal justice community; a representative of federal agencies participating in the CJIS systems; and representatives of criminal justice professional associations.

(c) All members of the Board will be appointed by the FBI Director.

(d) The Board functions solely as an advisory body in compliance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Title 5, United States Code, Appendix 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1987–2018 · leading case: Individually v. United States, 324 F. Supp. 3d 636 (D.S.C. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Individually v. United States, 324 F. Supp. 3d 636 (D.S.C. 2018). · cites it 2× “" 28 C.F.R. § 20.35 (a). It does not have authority to deny an FBI division access to an FBI-managed criminal information database.”
Rogan v. City of Los Angeles, 668 F. Supp. 1384 (C.D. Cal. 1987). “); see also: 28 C.F.R. 20.35(b), (e), (h) (1986) (Policies proposed by the Board become binding when adopted by the Director of the FBI.”
— 28 C.F.R. § 20.35(b) — 1 case
Rogan v. City of Los Angeles, 668 F. Supp. 1384 (C.D. Cal. 1987). “); see also: 28 C.F.R. 20.35(b), (e), (h) (1986) (Policies proposed by the Board become binding when adopted by the Director of the FBI.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.