28 C.F.R. § 20.37
Responsibility for accuracy, completeness, currency, and integrity
It shall be the responsibility of each criminal justice agency contributing data to the III System and the FIRS to assure that information on individuals is kept complete, accurate, and current so that all such records shall contain to the maximum extent feasible dispositions for all arrest data included therein. Dispositions should be submitted by criminal justice agencies within 120 days after the disposition has occurred.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case: Rogan v. City of Los Angeles, 668 F. Supp. 1384 (C.D. Cal. 1987).
Rogan v. City of Los Angeles, 668 F. Supp. 1384 (C.D. Cal. 1987). “28 C.F.R. 20.37 (1986) (“It shall be the responsibility of each criminal justice agency contributing data to [the] .”
Charles Edward Pruett v. Edward H. Levi, Attorney Gen. of the United States, 622 F.2d 256 (6th Cir. 1980). “The regulations declare that the contributing agency has the responsibility of assuring complete and accurate records, 28 C.F.R. § 20.37 , and they provide sanctions against the contributing agency for noncompliance.”
McKnight v. Webster, 499 F. Supp. 420 (E.D. Pa. 1980). “28 C.F.R. § 20.37 . It is also true that the FBI has the authority to suspend a contributing agency from participation in the criminal identification program for failure to comply with the requirements of the program.”
Tarlton v. Saxbe, 407 F. Supp. 1083 (D.D.C. 1976). “28 C.F.R. §§ 20.37 -.38 (1975); id. § 20.”
United States v. Cruz-García, 391 F. Supp. 3d 180 (2019). “Federal regulations mandate that criminal "information on individuals is kept compete, accurate, and current so that all such records shall contain to the maximum extent feasible dispositions for all arrest data included therein.”
Cunningham v. Kahler (W.D. Mo. 2024). “” 28 C.F.R. § 20.37 . To be clear, “[b]y placing records in the III [], [the Missouri State Highway Patrol] make[s] the information available for criminal justice purposes, not just firearm background checks.”
Kinkaid v. United States (W.D. Wash. 2020). “Defendant 17 United States adds that, under 28 C.F.R. § 20.37 , “[i]f any information in the NCIC [(National 18 Crime Information Center”)] database is found to be inaccurate, the entering/owning agency, 19 Thurston County, is obligated by regulation to correct that information.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.