28 C.F.R. § 26.2

[Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2021 · leading case: United States v. Battle, 272 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (N.D. Ga. 2003).
United States v. Battle, 272 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (N.D. Ga. 2003). “See Implementation of Death Sentences in Federal Cases, 28 C.F.R. §§ 26.2 , 26.3, 26.4 (2003). Upon review of the relevant regulations, the Court finds no inconsistency between them and the provision of the April 30 order.”
United States v. Hammer, 121 F. Supp. 2d 794 (M.D. Penn. 2000). “28 C.F.R. §§ 26.2 (b) and 26.4(g); 61 Pa.”
Montgomery v. Barr (D.D.C. 2021). · cites it 2× “” 28 C.F.R. § 26.2 (a)(3) (Nov. 2020 version).”
Montgomery v. Barr (D.D.C. 2020). “”3 28 C.F.R. § 26.2 (a)(3). The rule then provides as follows: 3 The judgment in this case authorized “the Attorney General” to specify “[t]he time, place and manner of execution,” “provided that the time shall not be sooner than 60 days nor later than 90 days after the date of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.