C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER III—FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC., DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 301—INMATE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION › Subpart B—Lost-Time Wages

28 C.F.R. § 301.202

Determination of work-relatedness

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) When the institution safety manager receives notice, or has reason to believe, a work-related injury may result in time lost from the work assignment, he or she shall present BP-140, Pages 1 and 2 (with the appropriate sections completed) to the Institution Safety Committee at the Committee's next regularly scheduled meeting. The Safety Committee shall make a determination of the injury's work-relatedness based on the available evidence and testimony. The determination shall be recorded on BP-140, Page 2, a copy of which shall be provided to the inmate.

(b) A determination of work-relatedness for purposes of awarding lost-time wages is not confirmation on the validity of any subsequent claim to receive compensation for work-related physical impairment or death.

[55 FR 9296, Mar. 12, 1990. Redesignated at 59 FR 2667, Jan. 18, 1994]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Loren Bagola v. Thomas Kindt
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Loren Bagola v. Thomas Kindt (1997) ca7 “See 28 C.F.R. § 301.202 (b) ("A determination of work-relatedness for purposes of awarding lost-time wages is not confirmation on the validity of any subsequent claim to receive compensation for work-related physical impairment or death.”
Rodriguez v. United States (2024) pamd “It observed that the coverage available under the IACA “compare[d] favorably with compensation laws all over the country,” and that “compensation laws are practically always thought of as substitutes for, not supplements to, common-law tort actions.”
Kenneth M. Chandler v. United States of America (2026) cod “21 at 5 (citing 28 C.F.R. § 301.202 (a)). It appears, though, that one was completed, Vargas Decl.”
Craig Cesal v. Federal Prison Industries, In (2014) ca7 “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 301.202 to 301.204. Once an inmate, like Cesal, transfers to another prison for reasons unrelated to the injury, the prisoner is no longer entitled to compensatory pay for that injury.”
Cesal v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (2014) ca7 “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 301.202 to 301.204. Once an inmate, like Cesal, transfers to another prison for reasons unrelated to the injury, the prisoner is no longer entitled to compensatory pay for that injury.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.