28 C.F.R. § 32.46

Director appeal

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In order to exhaust his administrative remedies, a claimant seeking relief from the denial of his claim shall appeal to the Director under subpart F of this part.

(b) Consistent with § 32.8, any claim denial that is not appealed to the Director under paragraph (a) of this section shall constitute the final agency determination, unless the denial is reviewed otherwise under subpart F of this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2007 · leading case: Julie Amber-Messick, Adm'x of the Est. of Christopher Kangas, Deceased v. United States, 483 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
Julie Amber-Messick, Adm'x of the Est. of Christopher Kangas, Deceased v. United States, 483 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “”) (current version at 28 C.F.R. § 32.46 (2006)). On April 28, 2005, the Director of BJA, in the Final Agency Decision, affirmed the Hearing Officer’s denial of benefits based on the conclusion that Christopher was not a “firefighter” or “public safety officer” within the…”
Amber-Messick, Adm'x of the Est. of Christopher Kangas, Deceased v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2007). “”) (current version at 28 C.F.R. § 32.46 (2006)). On April 28, 2005, the Director of BJA, in the Final Agency Decision, affirmed the Hearing Officer’s denial of benefits based on the conclusion that Christopher was not a “firefighter” or “public safety officer” within the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.