C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 35—NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY IN STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES › Subpart A—General

28 C.F.R. § 35.106

Notice

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

A public entity shall make available to applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the services, programs, or activities of the public entity, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the entity finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by the Act and this part.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2024 · leading case: Pierce v. County of Orange
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pierce v. County of Orange (2008) ca9 “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.106 , 35.107. On remand, the district court also should make findings on these issues.”
Brown v. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs. (2019) mdd “" 28 C.F.R. § 35.106 . To the extent that Plaintiffs seek to assert a stand-alone claim based purely on the Defendants' undisputed failure to abide by these regulations, this claim must fail.”
Clarkson v. Coughlin (1995) nysd · cites it 2× “” 28 C.F.R. § 35.106 . In addition, 28 C.F.”
Blatch Ex Rel. Clay v. Hernandez (2005) nysd “28 C.F.R. § 35.106 (2005). It is undisputed that NYCHA’s principal formal mechanism for the identification of mentally disabled persons who may be in need of accommodation is self-identification in response to annual inquiries that are sent to tenants of record in connection…”
Pierce v. County of Orange (2011) cacd · cites it 2× “3d at 1223 (citing 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.106 , 35.107). i. Notice Procedures Before 2009 223.”
McDonough (2010) mass “28 C.F.R. § 35.106 (2009) (under ADA, “public entity shall make available to .”
Stone v. New Jersey Administrative Office of the Courts (2014) ca3 “His arguments concerning failure to notify him adequately of his rights under the ADA, in violation of 28 C.F. R. § 35.106, are unavailing for the same reasons.”
Pierce v. County of Orange (2008) ca9 “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.106 , 35.107. On remand, the district court also should make findings on these issues.”
Foster v. Ohio D.R.C. (2023) ohsd · cites it 3× “107(A) and 28CFR35.106, a responsible [prison employee] give the Court notice about my accounting terms as this Court deems necessary, because, I, am, interested in this way of service, after, I have no access to a way of doing this or anything else independently due to a vast…”
Holmes v. Knodell (2024) mowd “28 C.F.R. § 35.106 and § 35.107. Plaintiffs Dallas and Holmes are qualified individuals with disabilities and their disabilities were known to Defendant.”
Pierce v. County of Orange (2008) ca9 “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 35.106 , 35.107. On remand, the district court also should make findings on these issues.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.