28 C.F.R. § 45.11

Reporting to the Office of the Inspector General

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Department of Justice employees have a duty to, and shall, report to the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General, or to their supervisor or their component's internal affairs office for referral to the Office of the Inspector General:

(a) Any allegation of waste, fraud, or abuse in a Department program or activity;

(b) Any allegation of criminal or serious administrative misconduct on the part of a Department employee (except those allegations of misconduct that are required to be reported to the Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility pursuant to § 45.12); and

(c) Any investigation of allegations of criminal misconduct against any Department employee.

[Order No. 2835-2006, 71 FR 54414, Sept. 15, 2006]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2015–2023 · leading case: Viola v. Ohio Attorney Gen. (N.D. Ohio 2021).
Viola v. Ohio Attorney Gen. (N.D. Ohio 2021). · cites it 13× “) He alleges that each of the Federal Defendants were aware of the above prosecutorial misconduct, as well as alleged misconduct by Defendant Kasaris, but improperly failed to report it in violation of 28 C.F.R. §§ 45.11 and 45.12; the United States Attorney’s Manual § 9-5.”
Hodges v. Wiegand (D.D.C. 2015). · cites it 2× “) MEMORANDUM OPINION Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel an Assistant United States Attorney and the Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility to perform a duty petitioner contends is required by 28 C.F.R. §§…”
Jones v. Hurley (E.D. Ky. 2023). “They may request an investigation through the BOP’s Internal Affairs Office or the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General, see 28 C.F.R. § 45.11 , which may serve to deter misconduct.”
Davis v. Althauser (E.D. Ky. 2023). “May 6 See 28 C.F.R. § 45.11 ; BOP Program Statement 3420.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.