28 C.F.R. § 48.7

Report of the Assistant Attorney General in Charge of the Antitrust Division

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division shall, not later than 30 days from the publication in the Federal Register of the notice required by § 48.6, submit to the Attorney General a report on any application filed pursuant to § 48.4. In preparing such report he may require submission by the applicants of any further information which may be relevant to a determination of whether approval of the proposed arrangement is warranted under the Act.

(b) In his report he may state (1) that the proposed arrangement should be approved or disapproved without a hearing; or (2) that a hearing should be held to resolve material issues of fact.

(c) The report shall be filed, and a copy shall be sent to the applicants. Upon the filing of the report, the Assistant Attorney General for Administration shall cause to be issued a press release setting forth the substance thereof.

(d) Any person may, within 30 days after filing of the report, file a reply to the report for the consideration of the Attorney General.

Notes of Decisions
Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press v. Richard Thornburgh, United States Attorney General (1989) cadc · cites it 2× “See 28 C.F.R. § 48.7 (1988). The then Assistant Attorney General, Douglas H.”
Committee for an Independent P-I v. Smith (1982) wawd · cites it 2× “28 C.F.R. § 48.7 . When a hearing is held, the Antitrust Division be *988 comes a party.”
Committee for an Independent P-I v. Hearst Corp. (1983) ca9 “28 C.F.R. § 48.7 (1982). If a hearing is held, the Antitrust Division becomes a party to the proceeding, id.”
Application for Approval of a Joint Operating Arrangement Under the Newspaper Preservation Act (1982) olc “1The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, acting under 28 C.F.R. § 48.7 (1980) and aftera review of documents and information submitted in support of the Application, recom­ mended that a hearing be held under 28 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.