28 C.F.R. § 541.2
Application
This program applies to sentenced and unsentenced inmates in Bureau custody. It also applies to sentenced and unsentenced inmates designated to any prison, institution, or facility in which persons are held in custody by direction of, or under an agreement with, the Bureau of Prisons.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: Von Kahl v. Brennan, 855 F. Supp. 1413 (M.D. Penn. 1994).
Von Kahl v. Brennan, 855 F. Supp. 1413 (M.D. Penn. 1994). “See 28 C.F.R. § 541.2 et seq. While the regulations substantially track the procedures outlined in Wolff, Young, 926 F.”
Buhl v. Hood, 81 F. App'x 273 (10th Cir. 2003). “He further alleged the reporting officer was also the investigating officer in violation of 28 C.F.R. § 541.2 . Id. at 4 . Finally, he claimed he was denied due process by the failure of the Central Office to respond to his appeal.”
Griffin v. Brooks, 13 F. App'x 861 (10th Cir. 2001). “See 28 C.F.R. § 541.2 (c). At the hearing, Mr.”
Daniel Velasquez v. Michael Benov, 518 F. App'x 555 (9th Cir. 2013). “Velasquez also contends that the investigating officer violated 28 C.F.R. § 541.2 (a) (2008), when he also filed the incident report.”
Michael Gorbey v. Warden Lewisburg USP (3rd Cir. 2023). “Gorbey claims that the sanctions imposed by the DHO were impermissible under 28 C.F.R. § 541.2 We agree with the District Court’s conclusion that the sanctions imposed were permissible.”
Villarreal v. Rickard (S.D.W. Va 2018). “28 C.F.R. § 541.2 (2011) provides: This program applies to sentenced and unsentenced inmates in Bureau custody.”
Stroud v. Stover (D. Conn. 2025). “The IDP, which “applies to sentenced and unsentenced inmates in Bureau custody,” 28 C.F.R. § 541.2 , provides a list of “Prohibited Acts” and “Available Sanctions.”
Davis v. Baysore (D. Colo. 2025). “§ 4042 (a)(1) (the BOP shall “have charge of the management and regulations of all Federal penal and correctional institutions”); 28 C.F.R. § 541.2 (BOP’s inmate discipline programs apply to “inmates in [BOP] custody” and “inmates designated to any prison, institution, or…”
Garcia v. Warden (D. Conn. 2025). “The IDP, which “applies to sentenced and unsentenced inmates in Bureau custody,” 28 C.F.R. § 541.2 , provides a list of “[p]rohibited acts” and “[a]vailable sanctions.”
Derek Capozzi v. USP Lewisburg Warden, 610 F. App'x 105 (3rd Cir. 2015). “28 C.F.R. § 541.2 (eff. June 20, 2011). 4 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.