28 C.F.R. § 541.25
Notice received when placed in the SHU
You will be notified of the reason(s) you are placed in the SHU as follows:
(a) Administrative detention status. When placed in administrative detention status, you will receive a copy of the administrative detention order, ordinarily within 24 hours, detailing the reason(s) for your placement. However, when placed in administrative detention status pending classification or while in holdover status, you will not receive an administrative detention order.
(b) Disciplinary segregation status. When you are to be placed in disciplinary segregation status as a sanction for violating Bureau regulations, you will be informed by the DHO at the end of your discipline hearing.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2018–2025 · leading case: Bistrian v. Levi, 299 F. Supp. 3d 686 (E.D. Pa. 2018).
Bistrian v. Levi, 299 F. Supp. 3d 686 (E.D. Pa. 2018). “He was subsequently arrested at the Canadian border as he attempted to flee the United States, and was sent to FDC Philadelphia where he was detained until sentencing.”
Craig v. Kizziah (E.D. Ky. 2019). “See 28 C.F.R. § 541.25 (detention order provided “ordinarily within 24 hours”).”
Johnson v. FCI Berlin, Warden (D.N.H. 2025). “28 C.F.R. § 541.25 , by failing to provide him with an ADO within twenty- four hours of his placement in the SHU advising him of the reason he was placed in the SHU, supported by objective and clearly articulated evidence; and b.”
Richardson v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2021). “Simms; (2) the BOP failed to provide an Administrative Detention Order, required by 28 C.F.R. §§ 541.25 (a), 541.26(a); and (3) he was never visited by a Segregation Review Official.”
Jordan v. Barves (M.D. Penn. 2024). “Additionally, to the extent that Jordan maintains that the BOP’s alleged violation of internal policies or regulations regarding failure to deliver the administrative detention order infringes his Fifth Amendment due process rights, it is well settled that “a violation of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.