28 C.F.R. § 550.57

Inmate appeals

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Inmates may seek formal review of complaints regarding the operation of the drug abuse treatment program by using administrative remedy procedures in 28 CFR part 542.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2000–2008 · leading case: Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S. 230 (2001).
Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S. 230 (2001). · cites it 2× “See 28 CFR §§ 550.57 (a)(1), (3) (2000) ("An inmate may receive incentives for his or her satisfactory involvement in the residential [drug treatment] program," including "[l]imited financial awards" and "[l]ocal institution incentives such as preferred living quarters or…”
Minotti v. Whitehead, 584 F. Supp. 2d 750 (D. Maryland 2008). “28 C.F.R. §§ 550.57 ; 550.58. *756 (iii) The “Nonviolent Offense” Requirement Congress did not define the term “nonviolent offense” in the statute and authorized the BOP to use its discretion in the implementation of the statute.”
United States v. Coates, 295 F. Supp. 2d 11 (D.D.C. 2003). “28 C.F.R. 550.57(a)(4). The fact that the defendant completed the RDAP despite the fact that she would not receive a sentence reduction demonstrates her commitment to rehabilitation and distinguishes her from the many prisoners who participate in rehabilitation programs solely…”
Dawkins v. Reno, 130 F. Supp. 2d 740 (E.D.N.C. 2000). “28 C.F.R. § 550.57 . In 1994, as an additional incentive, Congress granted the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the discretion to reduce the sentence of an inmate who successfully completes the RDAP, by a period not to exceed twelve months.”
— 28 C.F.R. § 550.57(a)(4) — 1 case
United States v. Coates, 295 F. Supp. 2d 11 (D.D.C. 2003). “28 C.F.R. 550.57(a)(4). The fact that the defendant completed the RDAP despite the fact that she would not receive a sentence reduction demonstrates her commitment to rehabilitation and distinguishes her from the many prisoners who participate in rehabilitation programs solely…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.