C.F.R. » Title 28 » CHAPTER I—DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE › PART 74—CIVIL LIBERTIES ACT REDRESS PROVISION › Subpart A—General

28 C.F.R. § 74.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this part is to implement section 105 of the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, which authorizes the Attorney General to locate, identify, and make payments to all eligible individuals of Japanese ancestry who were evacuated, relocated, and interned during World War II as a result of government action.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2000 · leading case: Douglas L. Ishida v. United States, 59 F.3d 1224 (Fed. Cir. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Douglas L. Ishida v. United States, 59 F.3d 1224 (Fed. Cir. 1995). “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 74.1 -.17 (1994). Through the Office of Redress Administra *1228 tion, Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice (ORA), the Attorney General notifies individuals of their potential eligibility and verifies their claims upon receipt of certain background…”
Murakami v. United States, 46 Fed. Cl. 653 (Fed. Cl. 2000). “See 28 C.F.R. §§ 74.1 -.17 (1994). 2 Congress initially authorized and appropriated $1.”
Suzuki v. United States, 29 Fed. Cl. 688 (Fed. Cl. 1993). “) Pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 74.1 -.17, the Attorney General, through the Office of Redress Administration, Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice (ORA), notifies individuals of their potential eligibility and verifies their claims upon receipt of certain background…”
Consolo v. United States, 31 Fed. Cl. 447 (Fed. Cl. 1994). “Pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 74.1 -.17, the Attorney General, through the Office of Redress Administration, Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice (ORA), notifies individuals of their potential *449 eligibility and verifies their claims upon receipt of certain background…”
Sato v. United States, 33 Fed. Cl. 818 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “Pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 74.1 -.17, the Attorney General, through the Office of Redress Administration, Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice (ORA), notifies individuals of their potential eligibility and verifies their claims upon receipt of certain background information.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.