Any producer required by this part to maintain records shall make such records available at the producer's place of business or at the place of business of a non-employee custodian of records. Each record shall be maintained for seven years from the date of creation or last amendment or addition. If the producer ceases to carry on the business, the records shall be maintained for five years thereafter. If the producer produces the book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally- or computer-manipulated image, digital image, or picture, or other matter (including but not limited to Internet computer site or services) as part of his control of or through his employment with an organization, records shall be made available at the organization's place of business or at the place of business of a non-employee custodian of records. If the organization is dissolved, the person who was responsible for maintaining the records, as described in § 75.6(b), shall continue to maintain the records for a period of five years after dissolution.
[73 FR 77470, Dec. 18, 2008]
Notes of Decisions
Connection Distrib. Co. v. Holder, 557 F.3d 321 (6th Cir. 2009).
· cites it 2× “§ 2257 (c); see also 28 C.F.R. §§ 75.4 -.5. And it must include a statement in its publications noting where the relevant records are kept and who maintains them.”
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Holder, 729 F. Supp. 2d 691 (E.D. Pa. 2010).
· cites it 2× “” 28 C.F.R. § 75.4 . Further, investigators are authorized to “enter without delay and at reasonable times any establishment of a producer where records .”
Am. Library Ass'n v. Janet Reno, 33 F.3d 78 (D.C. Cir. 1994).
“” 28 C.F.R. § 75.4 . The Government’s need to be able to identify performers and verify conformance with the Act is not dependent on the producer remaining in business.”
Am. Library Ass'n v. Barr, 794 F. Supp. 412 (D.D.C. 1992).
“28 C.F.R. § 75.4 . If the producer ceases to carry on business, a custodian must be named and the records must be maintained for an additional five years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.