29 C.F.R. § 102.8
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1954–2013 · leading case: Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132 (1975).
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132 (1975). “29 CFR § 102.8 ; Auto Workers v. Scofield, supra, at 219 .”
Ahearn v. Int'l Longshore & Warehouse Union, Locals 21 & 4, 721 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2013). “29 C.F.R. § 102.8 (“The term party ... shall mean .”
Richards v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 702 F.3d 1010 (7th Cir. 2012). “See 29 C.F.R. § 102.8 (charging parties considered to be parties to NLRB proceedings by default).”
Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers, Local 283 v. Scofield, 382 U.S. 205 (1965). “any person named or admitted as a party, or properly seeking and entitled as of right to be admitted as a party, in any Board proceeding, including, without limitation, any person filing a charge or petition under the act, any person named as respondent, as employer, or as party…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79, 404 U.S. 116 (1971). “14 See 29 CFR §§ 102.8 , 102.9, 102.109 (1971); International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Local 283 v.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Majestic Weaving Co., Inc., Local 815, Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, Intervenor, 355 F.2d 854 (2d Cir. 1966). “8, 29 C.F.R. § 102.8 (1965), see NLRB v. Majestic Weaving Co.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fred Stark, 525 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1976). “esses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and it may make the order of its own motion, but with the following equally mandatory qualification: This rule does not authorize exclusion of (1) a party who is a natural person, or (2) an officer or…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pesante, 119 F. Supp. 444 (S.D. Cal. 1954). “No proceedings are now, or at any time herein involved have been pending against any of such organizations and none of them are “parties” under 29 C.F.R. § 102.8 to the above proceeding, except the two stores in Long Beach and the one store in Wilmington.”
Leonard Giacalone v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 682 F.2d 427 (3rd Cir. 1982). “See 29 C.F.R. § 102.8 . 9 . E.g., NLRB v. Hendricks County Rural Electric Membership Corp.”
Ashley v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 454 F. Supp. 2d 441 (M.D.N.C. 2006). “29 C.F.R. § 102.8 (2006). This means that the party has the right to, among other things, subpoena evidence and witnesses, appear at the hearing, cross-examine witnesses, file motions and briefs, and seek judicial review of NLRB orders.”
Int'l Union of Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers, Afl-Cio v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Tiidee Prods., Inc., Intervenor(two Cases). Tiidee Prods., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Int'l Union of Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor (Two Cases), 502 F.2d 349 (D.C. Cir. 1974). “By contrast, a charging party, who is a party of right (29 C.F.R. 102.8 (1973)) permitted fully to litigate the case at the hearing (29 C.”
Reynolds v. Marlene Indus. Corp., 250 F. Supp. 722 (S.D.N.Y. 1966). “29 C.F.R. §§ 102.8 and 102.38. Predicated on this standing the union seeks leave to intervene in this proceeding.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.