29 C.F.R. § 1602.1
Purpose and scope
Section 709 of title VII (42 U.S.C. 2000e-8), section 107 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (42 U.S.C. 12117), section 207(a) of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) (42 U.S.C. 2000ff-6), and section 104 of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) (42 U.S.C 2000gg-2) require the Commission to establish regulations pursuant to which employers, labor organizations, joint labor-management committees, and employment agencies subject to those Acts shall make and preserve certain records and shall furnish specified information to aid in the administration and enforcement of the Acts.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2023 · leading case: Roderick A. McGarry v. Marilyn Pielech, 108 A.3d 998 (R.I. 2015).
Roderick A. McGarry v. Marilyn Pielech, 108 A.3d 998 (R.I. 2015). “See 29 C.F.R. § 1602.1 (defining the purpose and scope of the record-keeping regulations).”
Mathewson v. Aloha Airlines, Inc., 919 P.2d 969 (Haw. 1996). “Aloha cited 29 C.F.R. § 1602.1 et seq. and section 12-46-21 of the Hawai‘i Administrative Rules (HAR) in its opening brief.”
United States v. City of New York, 713 F. Supp. 2d 300 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). “§ 2000e-8; 29 C.F.R. § 1602.1 et seq. (relating to Title VII recordkeeping requirements); Byrnie, 243 F.”
Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 803 F. Supp. 259 (N.D. Cal. 1992). “§ 2000e-8(c) and 29 C.F.R. § 1602.1 et seq. 428. Where an employer has failed to retain records, plaintiff is entitled to an inference that the documents would have supported his or her case.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Riss Int'l Corp., 525 F. Supp. 1094 (W.D. Mo. 1981). “If there were, those records, and the application records once the company was put on notice that application and hiring were included in the investigation, were required to be retained until final disposition of this cause, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1602.1 . Common sense would…”
Carter v. Oasis Tropical Cafe, LLC (M.D. Fla. 2023). “, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1602.1 , 1602.14 (employer must preserve “[a]ny personnel or employment record made or kept .”
Canton v. U.S. Foods, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2023). “See 29 C.F.R. § 1602.1 . 22 Before propounding RFP Nos.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.