29 C.F.R. § 1620.21
Head of household
Since a “head of household” or “head of family” status bears no relationship to the requirements of the job or to the individual's performance on the job, such a claimed defense to an alleged EPA violation will be closely scrutinized as stated in § 1620.11(c).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1987–2018 · leading case: Aileen Rizo v. Jim Yovino, 887 F.3d 453 (9th Cir. 2018).
Aileen Rizo v. Jim Yovino, 887 F.3d 453 (9th Cir. 2018). “” 29 C.F.R. § 1620.21 (2017). In fact, a head-of-household benefits system appears to be in considerable tension with City of Los Angeles, Department of Water & Power v.”
Aileen Rizo v. Jim Yovino (9th Cir. 2018). “” 29 C.F.R. § 1620.21 (2017). In fact, a head-of-household benefits system appears to be in considerable tension with City of Los Angeles, Department of Water & Power v.”
Ewald v. Royal Norwegian Embassy, 82 F. Supp. 3d 871 (D. Minnesota 2014). “After Gandrud’s initial overture to Davidson, in which he suggested a $60,000 salary, Gandrud communicated with Johne, Ambassador Strpmmen, and others.”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 677 F. Supp. 918 (N.D. Ill. 1987). “4888, 29 C.F.R. § 1620.21 (a) (1985). Among the Department of Labor regulations thus adopted is 29 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.