29 C.F.R. § 1626.22

Rules to be liberally construed

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) These rules and regulations shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purposes and provisions of this Act and any other acts administered by the Commission.

(b) Whenever the Commission receives a charge or obtains information relating to possible violations of one of the statutes which it administers and the charge or information reveals possible violations of one or more of the other statutes which it administers, the Commission will treat such charges or information in accordance with all such relevant statutes.

(c) Whenever a charge is filed under one statute and it is subsequently believed that the alleged discrimination constitutes an unlawful employment practice under another statute administered and enforced by the Commission, the charge may be so amended and timeliness determined from the date of filing of the original charge.

[48 FR 140, Jan. 3, 1983. Redesignated at 68 FR 70152, Dec. 17, 2003]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2011–2012 · leading case: U.S. Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Randstad, 765 F. Supp. 2d 734 (D. Maryland 2011).
U.S. Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Randstad, 765 F. Supp. 2d 734 (D. Maryland 2011). · cites it 4× “The EEOC also argues that the Amended Charge is timely under 29 C.F.R. § 1626.22 (c), which provides that: Whenever a charge is filed under one statute and it is subsequently believed that the alleged discrimination constitutes an unlawful employment practice under another…”
Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Randstad, 685 F.3d 433 (4th Cir. 2012). “Third, although pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the statute at issue in Evans , the EEOC has determined that a charge alleging a violation of one statute may be amended to allege “that the alleged discrimination constitutes an unlawful employment practice…”
EEOC v. Randstad (4th Cir. 2012). “RANDSTAD crimination constitutes an unlawful employment practice under another statute administered and enforced by the Com- mission," 29 C.F.R. § 1626.22 (c), it appears § 1626.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.