C.F.R. » Title 29 » PART 18—RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES › Subpart A—General

29 C.F.R. § 18.34

Format of papers filed

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Every paper filed must be printed in black ink on 8.5 × 11-inch opaque white paper and begin with a caption that includes:

(a) The parties' names,

(b) A title that describes the paper's purpose, and

(c) The docket number assigned by the Office of Administrative Law Judges. If the Office has not assigned a docket number, the paper must bear the case number assigned by the Department of Labor agency where the matter originated. If the case number is an individual's Social Security number then only the last four digits may be used. See § 18.31(a)(1).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2019 · leading case: Augustine v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 429 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Augustine v. Dep't of Vets. Affairs, 429 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2005). “31 (2004) (Patent and Trademark Office); 29 C.F.R. § 18.34 (2004) (Department of Labor); 20 C.”
Shirley A. Smiley v. Dir., Off. of Workers Comp. Programs Navy Resale & Servs. Support Off., 984 F.2d 278 (9th Cir. 1993). “1989) (citing 29 C.F.R. §§ 18.34 (g)(3) and 18.36). However, there is no indication that the AU inquired into the ethical conflict posed by the dual representation or asked Killip whether his clients had consented to the conflict.”
Mohan Kutty v. United States Dep't of Labor, 764 F.3d 540 (6th Cir. 2014). “29 C.F.R. § 18.34 (a). The regulation permits “[p]ersons not attorneys” to appear in a representative capacity in adjudicative proceedings provided they apply prior to the hearings or to the ALJ at the commencement of the hearing.”
Lockheed Martin Energy Sys., Inc. v. Slavin, 190 F.R.D. 449 (E.D. Tenn. 1999). “Slavin is afforded a First Amendment protection in his remarks and criticisms of the undersigned, his abusive attacks directed to the undersigned in court documents and improper professional conduct throughout the matter herein, have demonstrated a failure to meet the standard…”
Ex parte Ninth Jud. Circuit v. In re Bradley Rowland Marshall, No. 27919 (S.C. Sept. 25, 2019). · cites it 3× “" Chartmans' letterhead indicates the company specializes in "Longshore and Federal Worker Claims.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.