29 C.F.R. § 1905.1
Purpose and scope
(a) This part contains rules of practice for administrative proceedings
(1) To grant variances and other relief under sections 6(b)(6)(A) and 6(d) of the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, and
(2) To provide limitations, variations, tolerances, and exemptions under section 16 of the Act.
(b) These rules shall be construed to secure a prompt and just conclusion of proceedings subject thereto.
(c) The rules of practice in this part do not apply to the granting of variances under section 6(b)(6)(C). Whenever appropriate, the procedure for granting such a variance shall be published in the
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1991–2018 · leading case: Corbesco, Inc. v. Elizabeth Dole, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Labor, & Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 926 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1991).
Corbesco, Inc. v. Elizabeth Dole, Sec'y, United States Dep't of Labor, & Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 926 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1991). “2 (1990); 29 C.F.R. §§ 1905.1 to 1905.51 (1990). Corbesco never pursued this alternative.”
Rma Eng'g S.A.R.L v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2018). “2 (a); see also 29 C.F.R. § 1905.1 . 48 Count 18 alleges that the use of “safety handrails, temporary stairs, and wood platforms” was “unreasonably stringent,” and RMA incurred substantial costs as a result.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.