C.F.R. » Title 29 » CHAPTER XVII—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › PART 1910—OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS › Subpart E—Exit Routes and Emergency Planning

29 C.F.R. § 1910.35

Compliance with alternate exit-route codes

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

OSHA will deem an employer demonstrating compliance with the exit-route provisions of NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2009 edition, or the exit-route provisions of the International Fire Code, 2009 edition, to be in compliance with the corresponding requirements in §§ 1910.34, 1910.36, and 1910.37 (incorporated by reference, see section § 1910.6).

[76 FR 33606, June 8, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1996–2005 · leading case: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sec'y of Labor, 406 F.3d 731 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sec'y of Labor, 406 F.3d 731 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “37 (f)(1) (2000), and could not be considered the “exits” contemplated by 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.35 (a)-(c) and 1910.37(a)-(f) (2000).”
Gotha v. United States, 929 F. Supp. 207 (D.V.I. 1996). “29 C.F.R. § 1910.35 (a). Clearly, these regulations do not apply to the conduct challenged by plaintiff.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.