29 C.F.R. § 1926.305

Jacks—lever and ratchet, screw, and hydraulic

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General requirements. (1) The manufacturer's rated capacity shall be legibly marked on all jacks and shall not be exceeded.

(2) All jacks shall have a positive stop to prevent overtravel.

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Blocking. When it is necessary to provide a firm foundation, the base of the jack shall be blocked or cribbed. Where there is a possibility of slippage of the metal cap of the jack, a wood block shall be placed between the cap and the load.

(d)(1) Operation and maintenance. (i) After the load has been raised, it shall be cribbed, blocked, or otherwise secured at once.

(ii) Hydraulic jacks exposed to freezing temperatures shall be supplied with an adequate antifreeze liquid.

(iii) All jacks shall be properly lubricated at regular intervals.

(iv) Each jack shall be thoroughly inspected at times which depend upon the service conditions. Inspections shall be not less frequent than the following:

(a) For constant or intermittent use at one locality, once every 6 months,

(b) For jacks sent out of shop for special work, when sent out and when returned,

(c) For a jack subjected to abnormal load or shock, immediately before and immediately thereafter.

(v) Repair or replacement parts shall be examined for possible defects.

(vi) Jacks which are out of order shall be tagged accordingly, and shall not be used until repairs are made.

[44 FR 8577, Feb. 9, 1979; 44 FR 20940, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 55 FR 42328, Oct. 18, 1990; 58 FR 35176, June 30, 1993]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2018–2019 · leading case: Comm'r of Labor & Indus. v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., 200 A.3d 844 (Md. 2019).
Comm'r of Labor & Indus. v. Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., 200 A.3d 844 (Md. 2019). · cites it 5× “First, Whiting-Turner was charged with violating 29 C.F.R. § 1926.305 (d)(1)(i), 7 due to their failure to secure the double-tee after it was raised by the hydraulic jack.”
Whiting-Turner Contracting v. Comm'r of Labor & Ind., 183 A.3d 799 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “The ALJ addressed first Citation 1, Item 1, alleging a violation of 29 C.F.R. § 1926.305 (d)(1)(i), which states that, "[a]fter the load has been raised, it shall be cribbed, blocked, or otherwise secured at once.”
Comm'r of Labor & Ind. v. Whiting-Turner, 462 Md. 479 (Md. 2019). · cites it 3× “First, Whiting-Turner was charged with violating 29 C.F.R. § 1926.305 (d)(1)(i),7 due to their failure to secure the double-tee after it was raised by the hydraulic jack.”
— 29 C.F.R. § 1926.305(d)(1)(i) — 1 case
Whiting-Turner Contracting v. Comm'r of Labor & Ind., 183 A.3d 799 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2018). “The ALJ addressed first Citation 1, Item 1, alleging a violation of 29 C.F.R. § 1926.305 (d)(1)(i), which states that, "[a]fter the load has been raised, it shall be cribbed, blocked, or otherwise secured at once.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.