29 C.F.R. § 1977.17

Withdrawal of complaint

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Enforcement of the provisions of section 11(c) is not only a matter of protecting rights of individual employees, but also of public interest. Attempts by an employee to withdraw a previously filed complaint will not necessarily result in termination of the Secretary's investigation. The Secretary's jurisdiction cannot be foreclosed as a matter of law by unilateral action of the employee. However, a voluntary and uncoerced request from a complainant to withdraw his complaint will be given careful consideration and substantial weight as a matter of policy and sound enforcement procedure.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2022 · leading case: Walsh v. Cmty. Health Ctr. of Richmond, Inc. (E.D.N.Y 2022).
Walsh v. Cmty. Health Ctr. of Richmond, Inc. (E.D.N.Y 2022). · cites it 2× “Nuñez, Section 11(c) suits serve a greater public interest than her individual recovery.”
Solis v. Consol. Gun Ranges, 780 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (W.D. Wash. 2011). “, 29 C.F.R. § 1977.17 (“Enforcement of the provisions of section 11(c) is not only a matter of protecting rights of individual employees, but also of public interest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.