29 C.F.R. § 2575.502c-1

Adjusted civil penalty under section 502(c)(1)

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

In accordance with the requirements of the 1990 Act, as amended, the maximum amount of the civil monetary penalty established by section 502(c)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), is hereby increased from $100 a day to $110 a day. This adjusted penalty applies only to violations occurring after July 29, 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2020 · leading case: Z. v. UnitedHealthcare Ins. Co. (W.D. Tex. 2020).
Z. v. UnitedHealthcare Ins. Co. (W.D. Tex. 2020). “C § 1024(B), §1132(c)(1) and 29 C.F.R 2575.502c-1; (2) breach of contract as to denial of insurance benefits under the Plan; (3) unjust enrichment; (4) quantum meruit; (5) violation of Texas Insur- ance Code § 1301.”
Wright v. Metro. Life Assurance Co. (D.D.C. 2009). “See 29 C.F.R. 2575.502c-1. 29 2006) (rejecting the view that the claims manual was relevant under the relevancy standards of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and remanding the issue to the magistrate judge to consider "which particular portions, if any, of the Claims Manual…”
Walker v. Pharm. Rsch. Mfrs. of Am. (D.D.C. 2009). “The purpose of this amendment, the plaintiff asserts, is to “clarify” that the requested relief “includes the $110 per day civil penalty provided under § 502(c) and 29 CFR 2575.502c-1.” Id. at 2. The defendants counter that the plaintiff’s attempt to add a claim under § 502(c)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.