29 C.F.R. § 2700.51
Hearing dates and sites
All cases will be assigned a hearing date and site by order of the ALJ. In fixing the time and place of the hearing, the ALJ shall give due regard to the convenience and necessity of the parties or their representatives and witnesses, the availability of suitable hearing facilities, and other relevant factors.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: S. Ohio Coal Co. v. Marshall, 464 F. Supp. 450 (S.D. Ohio 1978).
S. Ohio Coal Co. v. Marshall, 464 F. Supp. 450 (S.D. Ohio 1978). “29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.51 , 2700.58. If the petition for review is denied, the Administrative Law Judge’s decision “shall become the final decision of the Commission unless the Commission orders review on its own motion under § 2700.”
Marshall v. Conway, 491 F. Supp. 1123 (E.D. Pa. 1980). “29 C.F.R. § 2700.51 (1979). A party may request expedited proceedings.”
Sec'y of Labor v. Knight Hawk Coal, LLC (D.C. Cir. 2026). “§§ 820 (i), 823(d); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.51 . After considering evidence, the ALJ evaluates all proposed penalties de novo “according to six criteria,” reflecting the criteria that the Secretary uses to calibrate the initial penalty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.