29 C.F.R. § 553.103

“Same type of services” defined

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The 1985 Amendments provide that employees may volunteer hours of service to their public employer or agency provided “such services are not the same type of services which the individual is employed to perform for such public agency.” Employees may volunteer their services in one capacity or another without contemplation of pay for services rendered. The phrase “same type of services” means similar or identical services. In general, the Administrator will consider, but not as the only criteria, the duties and other factors contained in the definitions of the 3-digit categories of occupations in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles in determining whether the volunteer activities constitute the “same type of services” as the employment activities. Equally important in such a determination will be the consideration of all the facts and circumstances in a particular case, including whether the volunteer service is closely related to the actual duties performed by or responsibilities assigned to the employee.

(b) An example of an individual performing services which constitute the “same type of services” is a nurse employed by a State hospital who proposes to volunteer to perform nursing services at a State-operated health clinic which does not qualify as a separate public agency as discussed in § 553.102. Similarly, a firefighter cannot volunteer as a firefighter for the same public agency.

(c) Examples of volunteer services which do not constitute the “same type of services” include: A city police officer who volunteers as a part-time referee in a basketball league sponsored by the city; an employee of the city parks department who serves as a volunteer city firefighter; and an office employee of a city hospital or other health care institution who volunteers to spend time with a disabled or elderly person in the same institution during off duty hours as an act of charity.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case: Benshoff v. City of Virginia Beach, 180 F.3d 136 (4th Cir. 1999).
Benshoff v. City of Virginia Beach, 180 F.3d 136 (4th Cir. 1999). “” 29 C.F.R. § 553.103 (a). Because we conclude that plaintiffs did not volunteer their rescue squad services for a public agency, we need not determine whether plaintiffs’ ALS services for the rescue squads are of the "same type” as the BLS services they are required to provide…”
Joy Eberline v. Douglas J. Holdings, Inc., 982 F.3d 1006 (6th Cir. 2020). “See 29 C.F.R. § 553.103 . These regulations clarify that a person can simultaneously have an employment- and a non-employment relationship with the same entity.”
Cartaya v. United States Dep't of Agric. Forest Serv. (D. Or. 2022). “” 29 C.F.R. § 553.103 (a) (2021). For instance, a firefighter cannot volunteer as a firefighter for the same public agency, but a city parks department employee could serve as a volunteer city firefighter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.