29 C.F.R. § 778.111

Pieceworker

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Piece rates and supplements generally. When an employee is employed on a piece-rate basis, the regular hourly rate of pay is computed by adding together total earnings for the workweek from piece rates and all other sources (such as production bonuses) and any sums paid for waiting time or other hours worked (except statutory exclusions). This sum is then divided by the number of hours worked in the week for which such compensation was paid, to yield the pieceworker's “regular rate” for that week. For overtime work the pieceworker is entitled to be paid, in addition to the total weekly earnings at this regular rate for all hours worked, a sum equivalent to one-half this regular rate of pay multiplied by the number of hours worked in excess of 40 in the week. (For an alternative method of complying with the overtime requirements of the Act as far as pieceworkers are concerned, see § 778.418.) Only additional half-time pay is required in such cases where the employee has already received straight-time compensation at piece rates or by supplementary payments for all hours worked. Thus, for example, if the employee has worked 50 hours and has earned $491 at piece rates for 46 hours of productive work and in addition has been compensated at $8.00 an hour for 4 hours of waiting time, the total compensation, $523.00, must be divided by the total hours of work, 50, to arrive at the regular hourly rate of pay—$10.46. For the 10 hours of overtime the employee is entitled to additional compensation of $52.30 (10 hours at $5.23). For the week's work the employee is thus entitled to a total of $575.30 (which is equivalent to 40 hours at $10.46 plus 10 overtime hours at $15.69).

(b) Piece rates with minimum hourly guarantee. In some cases an employee is hired on a piece-rate basis coupled with a minimum hourly guaranty. Where the total piece-rate earnings for the workweek fall short of the amount that would be earned for the total hours of work at the guaranteed rate, the employee is paid the difference. In such weeks the employee is in fact paid at an hourly rate and the minimum hourly guaranty is the regular rate in that week. In the example just given, if the employee was guaranteed $11 an hour for productive working time, the employee would be paid $506 (46 hours at $11) for the 46 hours of productive work (instead of the $491 earned at piece rates). In a week in which no waiting time was involved, the employee would be owed an additional $5.50 (half time) for each of the 6 overtime hours worked, to bring the total compensation up to $539 (46 hours at $11 plus 6 hours at $5.50 or 40 hours at $11 plus 6 hours at $16.50). If the employee is paid at a different rate for waiting time, the regular rate is the weighted average of the 2 hourly rates, as discussed in § 778.115.

[76 FR 18857, Apr. 5, 2011]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2001–2026 · leading case: Edward Monroe v. FTS USA, LLC, 860 F.3d 389 (6th Cir. 2017).
Edward Monroe v. FTS USA, LLC, 860 F.3d 389 (6th Cir. 2017). · cites it 4× “29 C.F.R. § 778.111 (a). “Congress passed the FLSA with broad remedial intent” to address “unfair method[s] of competition in commerce” that cause “labor conditions detrimental to the maintenance of the minimum standard of living necessary for health, efficiency, and general…”
Matteo Brunozzi v. Cable Commc'ns, Inc., 851 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “CCI responds that its plan is legally sound because the-FLSA does not regulate bonus amounts and the technicians are paid their piece-rate wages plus overtime premiums at ½ their regular rate as required by 29 C.”
Alston v. DIRECTV, Inc., 254 F. Supp. 3d 765 (D.S.C. 2017). · cites it 4× “For instance, 29 C.F.R. § 778.111 (a) provides a method of calculation for when an employee is paid a piece-rate for productive hours and a separate rate for nonproductive hours.”
Pest v. Bridal Works of New York, Inc., 268 F. Supp. 3d 413 (E.D.N.Y 2017). · cites it 3× “Under 29 C.F.R. § 778.111 (a), piece-rate earnings must be converted to an hourly rate in order to determine whether the earnings comply with the overtime pay requirements set by federal and.”
Edward Monroe v. FTS USA, LLC, 815 F.3d 1000 (6th Cir. 2016). · cites it 4× “29 C.F.R. § 778.111 (a). “Congress passed the FLSA with broad remedial intent” to address “unfair method[s] of competition in commerce” that cause “labor conditions detrimental to the maintenance of the 2 The Honorable Bernice Donald presided over all pretrial and trial issues…”
Turner v. BFI Waste Servs., LLC, 268 F. Supp. 3d 831 (D.S.C. 2017). “110 , piecerate, 29 C.F.R. § 778.111 , day or job rate, 29 C.”
Butler v. DirectSat USA, LLC, 55 F. Supp. 3d 793 (D. Maryland 2014). “29 C.F.R. § 778.111 (a). . On August 26, 2014, Plaintiff Butler filed a motion for reconsideration regarding the dismissal of his MWPCL claim (ECF No.”
Butler v. DirectSAT USA, LLC, 47 F. Supp. 3d 300 (D. Maryland 2014). “29 C.F.R. § 778.111 (a). . Some technicians testified that they built them at home because they were ordered to.”
Lee v. Vance Exec. Prot., Inc., 7 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2001). “See 29 C.F.R. §§ 778.111 -.112 (2000). The Agents contend that they are paid a flat sum for a day’s work and consequently their overtime rate should be calculated pursuant to 29 C.”
Thompson v. Bruister & Assocs., 967 F. Supp. 2d 1204 (M.D. Tenn. 2013). “” 29 C.F.R. § 778.111 . “This sum is then divided by the number of hours worked in the week for which such compensation was paid, to yield the pieceworker’s “regular rate” for that week.”
Delpin Aponte v. United States, 83 Fed. Cl. 80 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “The plaintiffs shall file their second amended complaint within seven days of the date of this order.”
Bautista Hernandez v. Tadala's Nursery, Inc., 34 F. Supp. 3d 1229 (S.D. Fla. 2014). · cites it 2× “115 : see also 29 C.F.R. § 778.111 (stating that “[w]hen an employee is employed on a piece-rate basis, the regular hourly rate of pay is computed by adding together total earnings for the workweek from piece rates and .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.