29 C.F.R. § 8.11

Presentations of other interested persons

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Where a petition has been filed for review of a wage determination or other final decision of the Administrator or authorized representative, the Board shall notify the parties known or believed to be interested in the case. The Associate Solicitor and any other parties interested in presenting their views shall file a statement within 30 days of the filing of the petition (or such other time as is specified by the Board, with consideration of procurement deadlines, as appropriate).

(b) Where a petition has been filed for review of a decision issued pursuant to subparts B, D or E of part 6 of this title, any other parties to the proceeding interested in presenting their views shall file a statement within 30 days of the filing of the petition (or such other time as is specified by the Board, with consideration of procurement deadlines, as appropriate).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1990 · leading case: Danielsen v. Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Ctr., Inc., 746 F. Supp. 170 (D.D.C. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Danielsen v. Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Ctr., Inc., 746 F. Supp. 170 (D.D.C. 1990). · cites it 2× “) see also 29 C.F.R. § 8.11 . In January 1989, the Deputy Secretary affirmed the Administrator’s decision and directed that back wages should be paid from December 1, 1985, the effective date of B-0 Contract # 2.”

Danielsen v. Dole, 746 F. Supp. 160 (D.D.C. 1990). · cites it 2× “See 29 C.F.R. § 8.11 ; Gross Aff. U 13. On January 10, 1989, the Deputy Secretary issued a final decision affirming the Administrator’s conformance decisions regarding B-0 Contract # 2 in their entirety and directing that Burnside-Ott’s employees be paid the wage rates as…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.