30 C.F.R. § 250.203
Are there special requirements if my well affects an adjacent property?
For wells that could intersect or drain an adjacent property, the Regional Supervisor may require special measures to protect the rights of the Federal government and objecting lessees or operators of adjacent leases or units.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2001–2008 · leading case: California Ex Rel. California Coastal Comm'n v. Norton, 150 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (N.D. Cal. 2001).
California Ex Rel. California Coastal Comm'n v. Norton, 150 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (N.D. Cal. 2001). “§ 1340 ; 30 C.F.R. § 250.203 . At this stage, the lessee submits a proposed EP to the Regional Supervisor of the MMS for approval.”
Alaska Wilderness League v. Kempthorne, 548 F.3d 815 (9th Cir. 2008). “" 30 C.F.R. § 250.203 . Exploration plans must be "project specific" and describe the "resources, conditions, and activities" that could be affected.”
Alaska Wilderness v. Kempthorne (9th Cir. 2008). “” 30 C.F.R. § 250.203 . Exploration plans must be “project specif- ic” and describe the “resources, conditions, and activities” that could be affected.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.