30 C.F.R. § 75.1725
Machinery and equipment; operation and maintenance
(a) Mobile and stationary machinery and equipment shall be maintained in safe operating condition and machinery or equipment in unsafe condition shall be removed from service immediately.
(b) Machinery and equipment shall be operated only by persons authorized to operate such machinery or equipment.
(c) Repairs or maintenance shall not be performed on machinery until the power is off and the machinery is blocked against motion, except where machinery motion is necessary to make adjustments.
(d) Machinery shall not be lubricated manually while in motion, unless equipped with extended fittings or cups.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1986–2016 · leading case: Hunt v. Brooks Run Mining Co., 51 F. Supp. 3d 627 (S.D.W. Va 2014).
Hunt v. Brooks Run Mining Co., 51 F. Supp. 3d 627 (S.D.W. Va 2014). “30 C.F.R. § 75.1725 (a) As to the safety regulation allegedly violated, plaintiff contends that the continued use of “hands on” roof bolting tools violated 30 C.”
Sec'y of Labor v. Ohio Valley Coal Co., 359 F.3d 531 (D.C. Cir. 2004). “” 30 C.F.R. § 75.1725 (c) (2003). The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (“FMSHRC” or “Commission”) vacated the citation, holding that Mr.”
Walker Stone Co., Inc. v. The Sec'y of Labor Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 156 F.3d 1076 (10th Cir. 1998). “” 30 C.F.R. § 75.1725 (c). The question before the Commission was whether extending an underground conveyor belt constituted maintenance for purposes of the standard.”
Otis Elevator Co. v. Sec'y of Labor & Fed. Mine Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, 921 F.2d 1285 (D.C. Cir. 1990). “1725 (a), which provides that [m]obile and stationary machinery and equipment shall be maintained in safe operating condition and machinery or equipment in unsafe condition shall be removed from service immediately. In order to give some content to that amorphous command, the…”
Consol Buchanan Mining Co., LLC v. Sec'y of Labor, 841 F.3d 642 (4th Cir. 2016). “Following its investigation, MSHA petitioned the Commission to assess civil penalties against Consol for violations of two mine safety regulations: (1) 30 C.F.R. § 75.1725 (a) (the" “Mining Equipment Rule”), which requires mine operators to remove unsafe mining machinery or…”
Cooper v. Ingersoll-Rand Co., 628 F. Supp. 1488 (W.D. Va. 1986). “” 30 C.F.R. § 75.1725 (e) (1985). It is without question that the federal safety regulations apply to the activities carried out by C.”
Consol Buchanan Mining Co. v. Sec'y of Labor (4th Cir. 2016). “Following its investigation, MSHA petitioned the Commission to assess civil penalties against Consol for violations of two mine safety regulations: (1) 30 C.F.R. § 75.1725 (a) (the “Mining Equipment Rule”), which requires mine operators to remove unsafe mining machinery or…”
Walker Stone Co. v. MSHA (10th Cir. 1998). “” 30 C.F.R. § 75.1725 (c). The question before the Commission was whether extending an underground conveyor belt constituted maintenance for purposes of the standard.”
— 30 C.F.R. § 75.1725(a) — 1 case
Hunt v. Brooks Run Mining Co., 51 F. Supp. 3d 627 (S.D.W. Va 2014). “30 C.F.R. § 75.1725 (a) As to the safety regulation allegedly violated, plaintiff contends that the continued use of “hands on” roof bolting tools violated 30 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.