31 C.F.R. § 515.101
Relation of this part to other laws and regulations
(a) This part is separate from, and independent of, the other parts of this chapter with the exception of part 501 of this chapter, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements and license application and other procedures of which apply to this part. No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to one of those parts, or any other provision of law, authorizes any transaction prohibited by this part.
(b) No license or authorization contained in or issued pursuant to this part shall be deemed to authorize any transaction prohibited by any law other than the Trading With the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. 4301-4341, the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. 2370, or any proclamation, order, regulation or license issued pursuant thereto.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1964–2014 · leading case: United States of Am., Cross-Appellee v. Michael MacKo Cross-Appellant, Frank Van Ameringen, 994 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1993).
United States of Am., Cross-Appellee v. Michael MacKo Cross-Appellant, Frank Van Ameringen, 994 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1993). “§ 5 (1988), and the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. §§ 515.101 -.901 (1992). The district court’s order followed a trial at which a jury found the men guilty of the embargo violations and related charges.”
Emmpresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp., 213 F. Supp. 2d 247 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “” 31 C.F.R. §§ 515.101 et seq. (1999) (the “Embargo”).”
ABC Charters, Inc. v. Bronson, 591 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (S.D. Fla. 2008). “Plaintiffs each operate under a statutory and regulatory web including the Trading with the Enemy Act ( 50 USC § 5 ) and regulations promulgated and enforced by the United States Treasury Department, Office of Foreign Assets Control, ( 31 C.F.R. § 515.101 et seq.), as well as…”
Vera v. Repub. of Cuba, 40 F. Supp. 3d 367 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). “§ 5; Cuban Assets Control Regulation, 31 C.F.R. § 515.101 et seq. (2011); Hausler v.”
Banco Nacional De Cuba v. Farr, 243 F. Supp. 957 (S.D.N.Y. 1965). “Complications not relevant here arose from the Cuban Assets Control Regulations effective July 8, 1963 ( 31 C.F.R. §§ 515.101 -.808), which, it was claimed, required that entry of judgment and execution must be licensed by the Treasury Department.”
MacEwan v. Rusk, 228 F. Supp. 306 (E.D. Pa. 1964). “6974, 31 C.F.R. 515.101 (July 8, 1963); See “Provisions of Federal Law in Effect in Time of National Emergency”, Report to the House Committee on the Judiciary, 87th Cong.”
See More Light Investments v. Morgan Stanley Dw Inc., 415 F. App'x 1 (9th Cir. 2011). “1 Because we find *2 that the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 515.101 et seq. (2009) (“CACR”), are not “well defined, explicit, and clearly applicable” to the bond transaction at issue here and because it is not clear that the arbitrators exercised a manifest…”
Am. Documentary Films, Inc. v. Sec'y of the Treasury of the United States, 344 F. Supp. 703 (S.D.N.Y. 1972). “65 enjoining the defendants from interfering with the importation or exhibition of these films of Cuban origin, for summary judgment and for a declaratory judgment declaring that 31 C.F.R. §§ 515.101 et seq. and particularly 31 C.”
Am. Bank & Trust Co. v. Bond Int'l Ltd., 464 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (N.D. Okla. 2006). “(“TWEA”), and the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 515.101 , et seq. (“CACR”), invalidate the security agreements held by American Bank and Trust Company (“American”) in collateral owned by defendants.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.