50 U.S.C. § 4301

Designation of chapter

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 50 CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known as the “Trading with the enemy 11 So in original. Act.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 2019–2026 · leading case: Kirell F. Bettis v. Treasurer of the United States (C.D. Cal. 2023).
Kirell F. Bettis v. Treasurer of the United States (C.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2× “on the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 4301 , et seq., in an attempt to support his claims and recover billions of dollars from the United States.”
Rashie v. United States (D.D.C. 2024). · cites it 2× “6 In his “Response to Motion to Dismiss and Notice and Motion to Amend Complaint by Joinder of Indispensable Claimants, Defendants/Respondents, and Claims Under the Trading With The Enemy Act (TWEA) ( 50 U.S.C.A. §§ 4301 to 4341),” Mr. Rashie also alleges that the United States…”
McBride v. Mnuchin (D.D.C. 2019). “McBride argues that this Court has jurisdiction over the case under the Trading with the Enemy Act (“TWEA”), 50 U.S.C. §§ 4301 et seq. Id. at 2 (citing 50 U.”
United States v. Oseguera Gonzalez (D.D.C. 2020). “2001) (holding that the government must prove, under the Trading With the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 4301 et seq., that “the defendants knew that their planned conduct was legally 7 The distinction between Bryan, on the one hand, and Cheek and Ratzlaf, on the other, appears to…”
Chery v. Alien Prop. Custodian (S.D. Fla. 2022). “) In the Complaint, Plaintiff purports to bring this action under Section 9(a) of the federal Trading with the Enemy Act (“TWEA”), codified at 50 U.S.C. §4301 , et seq. (Id. at ¶ 6.) Plaintiff claims that a “[s]ecurities [f]und” and “[m]unicipal [i]ncome [f]und” were “conveyed,…”
Blackwell v. Alien Prop. Custodian Rep. (D.N.M. 2024). “Plaintiff indicates he is seeking relief pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 4301 et seq., but has not included a short and plain statement showing that the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act to enter an order regarding the…”
Blackwell v. Alien Prop. Custodian Rep. (D.N.M. 2024). “Plaintiff indicates he is seeking relief pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. §§ 4301 et seq., but has not included a short and plain statement showing that the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act to enter an order regarding the…”
Bacardi & Co. Ltd. v. Empresa Cubana Exportadora De Alimentos Y Productos Varios (D.D.C. 2024). “The Embargo and Section 211 In 1963, the United States imposed a total embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba under the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. § 4301 et. seq, implemented by the Cuban Asset Control Regulations (“CACR”), 31 C.”
Folsom v. Yellen (D. Nev. 2024). “Folsom further 19 alleges that the Secretary is the trustee of that trust and argues that the Trading with the Enemy 20 Act (“the Act”), 50 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq., provides a basis for the Court to return the alleged 21 trust to him.”
Fowler v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2024). “He further appears to allege that the “Alien Property Custodian,” Attorney General of the United States, and the “United States Treasurer” have violated his rights under the Trading with the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. Before the Court is the Government’s Motion to…”
Rashie v. United States (D.D.C. 2025). “t by Military Commission, and for Damages Against Public Official Bond (in Defendants’/Respondents’ Individual Capacity(ies)) and for Declaratory Relief and Injunctive Relief (in Defendants’/Respondents’ Official Capacity(ies)),” which he also claims to be an “Intervention…”
V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump, 2025 CIT 66 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2025). “411 (1917) (codified as amended at 50 U.S.C. §§ 4301 to 4341); see also Christopher A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.