32 C.F.R. § 1624.1
Random selection procedures for induction
(a) The Director of Selective Service shall from time to time establish a random selection sequence for induction by a drawing to be conducted in the place and on a date the Director shall fix. The random selection method shall use 365 days, or when appropriate, 366 days to represent the birthdays (month and day only) of all registrants who, during the specified calendar year(s) attain their 18th year of birth. The drawing, commencing with the first day selected, and continuing until all 365 days or, when appropriate 366 days are drawn, shall be accomplished impartially. The random sequence number thus determined for any registrant shall apply to him so long as he remains subject to induction for military training and service by random selection.
(b) The date of birth of the registrant that appears on his Selective Service Registration Record on the day before the lottery is conducted to establish his random selection sequence will be conclusive as to his date of birth in all matters pertaining to his relations with the Selective Service System.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 103
cases, 1952–1975 · leading case: United States v. Weller, 401 U.S. 254 (1971).
United States v. Weller, 401 U.S. 254 (1971). “He specifically requested that his lawyer be allowed to accompany him at the time of his personal appearance before his local board, but the board, relying on 32 CFR § 1624.1 (b), denied the request and conducted the personal appearance without the appellee's counsel present.”
McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. 185 (1969). “32 CFR §§ 1624.1 , 1624.2 (1969). The board then determines whether or not to reconsider the registrant's classification.”
Oestereich v. Selective Serv. Sys. Local Bd. No. 11, 393 U.S. 233 (1969). “mposition of the Boards, and their administrative procedures, render them wholly unsuitable forums for the adjudication of these matters: local and appeal Boards consist of part-time, uncompensated members, chosen ideally to be representative of the *243 registrants'…”
Cornelious Lockhart v. United States, 420 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1970). “See 32 CFR 1624.1, 1624.2, 1624.2(e), 1625.13 (1969).”
McGee v. United States, 402 U.S. 479 (1971). “[11] See 32 CFR §§ 1624.1 , 1624.2. [12] See 32 CFR §§ 1626.”
Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295 (1970). “) The right to a personal appearance "in any other case" is covered by 32 CFR § 1624.1 (a). That section gives the right to "[e]very registrant after his classification is determined by the local board " provided a request is made therefor within 30 days.”
United States v. Weller, 309 F. Supp. 50 (N.D. Cal. 1969). “Defendant contends that his constitutional rights were violated because his request to have his attorney present during the personal appearance on his conscientious objector claim was denied pursuant to 32 C.F.R. § 1624.1 (b) which provides: * * * no registrant may be…”
Franklin Henry Chaney v. United States, 406 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1969). “32 C.F.R. 1624.1. “b. The prohibition against his presenting supporting witnesses, except as allowed by the board in its discretion.”
William Creighton Vaughn v. United States, 404 F.2d 586 (8th Cir. 1968). “1, every registrant after his classification has been determined by the local board shall have an opportunity to appear in person before the board 'if he files a written request therefor within 30 days after the local board has mailed a Notice of Classification to him. Such 30…”
Gary Herndon McCoy v. United States, 403 F.2d 896 (5th Cir. 1968). “Selective Service Regulations, 32 C.F.R. § 1624.1 (b), 8 provide that a registrant is not entitled to assistance of counsel in appearances before the board.”
United States v. Stephen R. Evans, 425 F.2d 302 (9th Cir. 1970). “32 CFR 1624.1(b) provides in part, “* * * [N]o registrant may be represented before the local board by anyone acting as attorney or legal counsel.”
United States v. John Steven Rundle, 413 F.2d 329 (8th Cir. 1969). “25(b) (effective July 1967). 2a 20 Secondly, by refusing to reopen Rundle's classification under 1625.”
— 32 C.F.R. § 1624.1(a) — 6 cases
James E. Powers v. George T. Powers, Iii, Major Gen., U.S. Army Commanding Gen., U.S. Army Air Def. Ctr., Fort Bliss, Texas, 400 F.2d 438 (5th Cir. 1968).
United States of Am. Ex Rel. Donnell Leonard Luster v. Colonel William H. McBee, 422 F.2d 562 (7th Cir. 1970).
United States v. Joseph Thomas Mulloy, 412 F.2d 421 (6th Cir. 1969).
United States v. David Blair Craft, 423 F.2d 829 (9th Cir. 1970).
Ryan v. Hershey, 445 F.2d 560 (8th Cir. 1971).
— 32 C.F.R. § 1624.1(b) — 8 cases
United States v. Stephen R. Evans, 425 F.2d 302 (9th Cir. 1970). “32 CFR 1624.1(b) provides in part, “* * * [N]o registrant may be represented before the local board by anyone acting as attorney or legal counsel.”
Cornelious Lockhart v. United States, 420 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1970). “See 32 CFR 1624.1, 1624.2, 1624.2(e), 1625.13 (1969).”
United States v. Derstine, 129 F. Supp. 117 (E.D. Pa. 1954).
John Henry Wright v. Dee Ingold, as Acting Dir. of the Selective Serv. Sys., 445 F.2d 109 (7th Cir. 1971).
United States v. Samir Ibrahim Tantash, 409 F.2d 227 (9th Cir. 1969).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.