32 C.F.R. § 1900.41

Designation of authority to hear appeals

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Agency Release Panel (ARP). Appeals of initial adverse decisions under the FOIA shall be reviewed by the ARP which shall issue the final Agency decision.

(b) ARP membership. The ARP is chaired by the Director, Enterprise Data Management (EDM) (or the Deputy Director, EDM, acting on the Director's behalf), and is composed of the Information Review Officers from the various Directorates, a voting representative of the Office of General Counsel, as well as the representatives of the various CIA release programs and offices. The Information and Privacy Coordinator also serves as Executive Secretary of the ARP. The Chair may request interested parties to participate when special equities or expertise are involved.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2016 · leading case: Wolf v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 473 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007).
Wolf v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 473 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “Further, the Director chairs the Agency Release Panel (ARP), 32 C.F.R. § 1900.41 (c)(1) (2006), which makes final determinations regarding administrative appeals under the FOIA.”
Florez v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 829 F.3d 178 (2d Cir. 2016). “” 32 C.F.R. § 1900.41 (c). . "The exhaustion of administrative remedies by plaintiff is not at issue here.”
Florez v. CIA (2d Cir. 2016). “” 32 C.F.R. § 1900.41 (c). 4 “The exhaustion of administrative remedies by plaintiff is not at issue here.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.